My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61992
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:24:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001085
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/19/2002
Doc Name
Engineering Plans
From
124th Estates Partners
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1__1 <br /> <br />1 <br />_ Brighton Water Storage Project - <br />Slope Stability Calculations <br />- Adams CounTy; Colorado <br />The Contractor should keep the lateral extent of exposed back cut slope. open at any one rime to a <br />minimum. Wider extents of open slope will entail an increased risk of erosion and local slope <br />failures, and associated increased slope maintenance during construction, <br />Similarly, the temporary slope which will be created as the clay liner is brought up appears to <br />have an acceptable factor of safety for a temporary condition when placed at a 1'/,:1 {horizontal <br />vertical) slope angle and properly moisture-conditioned and compacted. The suggested 15-foot <br />width for the clay liner appeazs acceptable, as well, in this regard. Again, the factors of safety <br />estimated for this study assumed a drained condition. <br />GROUND'S analyses indicated a factor of safety on the order of 1,6 against deep seated failure <br />for the proposed 2'/x:l (horizontal :vertical) permanent slope configuration. Factors of safety <br />were estimated for a statio and de-watered (empty reservoir) condition, such as would exist upon <br />completion of project earthworks. A factor of-safety of 1.6 is considered adequate for a <br />permanent slope configuration. Surficial erosion and local sloughing-which likely will require <br />periodic maintenance shotild be anticipated, particularly in more granular $il materials. Project <br />plans should allow for periodic maintenance of the reservoir slopes. It should be noted, again, <br />that the material properties used for the `miscellaneous fill' were assumed. We recommend that <br />the materials actually proposed for use as the `miscellaneous fill' be tested, and the conclusions <br />and recommendations herein updated, once those soils are identified. <br />Project Earthworks Site soils free of deleterious materials are, in general, suitable for placement <br />as compacted fill. Caze should be taken, however, with regazd to achieving and maintaining <br />proper moisture contents during placement and compaction. <br />Prior to earthwork construction, existing structures, vegetation, topsoil and other deleterious <br />materials should be removed and disposed of off-site. Relic underground utilities should be <br />abaridoned in accordance with applicable regulations, removed as necessary, and capped at the <br />marginsof the property. <br />If it is necessary to import material to. the site as common fill, the imported soils should be free of <br />' organic material, and other deleterious materials, Imported material should have less than 50 <br />percent passing the No. 200 sieve and should have a plasticity index of.less than between 5 and <br />' 30. All soils proposed for import should be. tested and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer <br />prior to transport to the site. <br />Job No. 02-0065 Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page'? <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.