My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61716
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:16:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 17 STIPULATIONS & RESPONSES, BEAR NO. 3 MINE, 1982
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. William A. Bear -2- June 22, 1982 <br />• P. Brand name and manufacturer/supplier <br />C. Chemical or generic formula <br />D. Application rate/dosage <br />E. Use of any coagulant aids <br />. F. Lab results of jar tests <br />III. Monitoring of Effluent <br />A. Total volume of flocculant used per quarter <br />B. Discharges should be monitored for all surface water parameters in <br />Attachment A. (After a year's monitoring data, the Division may reduce <br />the number of parameters required, based on site-specific conditions.) <br />IV. Sediment Monitori <br />A. Sediment may need testing depending on type of coagulant and method of <br />disposal. These sediments may be toxic due to the concentration of <br />coagulant, or unsuitable due to colloids. <br />V. Operational Considerations <br />A. If discharge will continue after closing the mine, the company must <br />commit to treating as Iong as required. Under Section 4.05.2(2), <br />the facilities must be maintained until either the discharge continu- <br />• ously meets effluent limitations without treatment or until the discharge <br />has permanently ceased. <br />Second, it appears from the sediment control design presented that <br />water would discharge through the emergency spillway as the result <br />of a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event. This is specifically <br />prohibited by Rule 4.05.6(3)(e) and the EPA regulations for waste <br />water treatment upon which the sediment control regulations are based. <br />In order to avoid discharging water through the emergency spillway during a <br />10-year, 24-hour storm, an open orifice dewatering device/principal spillway <br />would have to be incorporated into the pond design. Considerations for such <br />a device should include: <br />Z. flood routing to show detention time and to show that emergency <br />spillway discharges will not occur. <br />a. a detention time of 6 to 8 hours is sufficient for most <br />flocculated systems. <br />2.. sufficient storage below the elevation of the dewatering device <br />to allow for sediment storage. <br />3. a configuration designed to preclude discharge of material suspended <br />on the surface film (a common problem with coal fines, oil and grease). <br />• <br />n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.