My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-07-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2007-07-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:16:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/30/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.04.6 Geology Description
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u <br />• <br />i• <br />stratigraphy above the upper Dakota coal seam) thickness at Sites 871 E, 870E, and 872 was <br />approximately 30, 60, and 100 feet, respectively. The locations of these holes are shown on Map <br />2.04.6-1. The Phase I sampling density of 1 hole/160 acres meets the hole intensity criteria <br />discussed above to adequately describe the OIU variability. <br />Contamination. Numerous overburden sample contamination problems have been documented <br />over the last 10 years in the western United States. Drilling fluids, foam additives, and muds can <br />appreciably affect the soluble constituents (especially EC, SAR, and NH,) in the sample. During <br />rotary drilling for cores or cuttings, it is necessary to use a drilling medium such as air, water, or <br />mud for lifting cuttings from the borehole. For overburden baseline studies, it is rewmmended that <br />air be used whenever possible, water second, and mud (or foam) avoided unless absolutely <br />necessary to overcome circulation problems or to lift cuttings from deep holes (Barrett et a1.,1980; <br />Power and Sandoval, 1976; Dollhopf et al., 1981; and Peabody Coal Company, 1987). A chemical <br />analysis should be obtained on the water, foam, and/or drilling mud whenever they are utilized. <br />Random sample contamination often results in serious misinterpretations of the data. Many <br />previously reported unsuitable copper, molybdenum, zinc, and especially lead concentrations were <br />more apt to have been caused by drill stem grease contamination than natural mineralized strata. <br />Dollhopf and Goering (1983), Dollhopf et al. (1981), Peabody Coal Company (1986), and Rochelle <br />Coal Company (1984) all demonstrated that significant contamination resulted from zinc, copper, <br />molybdenum, and lead based drill stem joint lubricants. A noncontaminating drill stem joint <br />lubricant should be utilized when copper, lead, zinc, or molybdenum are included on the baseline <br />parameter list. <br />A noncontaminating drill stem joint lubricant (lithium based) was utilized at all 1986 sample sites <br />within the New Horizon 2 study area. Bore holes completed in 1986 were drilled exclusively with <br />air. <br />Drilling and Collection. Overburden materials are generally sampled by utilizing one or more of <br />the following three methods; continuous cores, cuttings or chips, and highwall or outcrop grab <br />samples. Barrett et al. (1980), Dollhopf et al. (1981), MDSL (1983), Harrington (1983), WDEQ <br />(1985), and USDI-OSMRE (1985b) all recommend that a combination of continuous core and drill <br />REVISED August 2006 2.04.6-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.