Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Thomas Schreiner • <br />Re: Rimer Yulley Resource, M-2001-090 <br />December 4, 2001 <br />Page 4 of 4.. <br /> <br />You are aware that Halsnes is suing More because Halsnes believes he has an agreement to mine. <br />the property. With More being the defendant; More is denying any agreement to mine or lease <br />with Halsnes. <br />Both More and Lafarge Corporation are in agreement that this application should proceed. <br />6.4.19 EXHIBIT S -Permanent Man-Made Structures ~,,s~~~ <br />22. Fv"'d 'JN~ <br />Prior to the relocation of the Suttle Ditch, the ap~licant will provide the Division a copy of an <br />agreement with the downsti•e sets of the ditch on any terms and conditions associated with <br />relocating the ditch. 'As th Swale area/Little River~is not an irrigation ditch and there are no <br />downstream water rights asso tated_.with~he- Swale area, and More Family Ranches 'are the <br />owners, there is no need for an additional agreement docume to relocate. this waste water return <br />feature. ~ ~~~,~/~,."7 <br />We believe the above information adequately addresses the commerts/concerns you have raised <br />in your second adequacy comments. We Look forward to your approval of this application. <br />Please call if you need additional information or have questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />Applegate Group, inc. <br />v` <br />Pamela E. Acre <br />Environmental Compliance Specialist <br />Encls. <br />cc: <br />AG File No. 01-224 <br />Gary Tuttle, Lafarge <br />Routt County Clerk & Recorder, overnight <br />