My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61428
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61428
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:08:01 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:09:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991146
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/24/1992
Doc Name
ADDITIONAL ADEQUACY ITEMS ZMK MINE CONSTRUCTION INC ZMK GRAVEL PIT FN M-91-146
From
MLRD
To
MONADROCK MINERAL SERVICES
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT C MINING PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 8663567 <br />FAx~303 832-6106 <br />January 24, 1992 <br />c+T A Tr-r1T'' COLORADO ' °J <br />of cam <br />i.4'=- R9 <br />N` JQ;, $ <br />"C 8'^' <br />id_.~' . <br />to Ta ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R. Banta. <br />Division Dnector <br />Mr. Robert Larson <br />Monadrock Mineral Services <br />P.O. Box 85 <br />Ouray, CO 81427 <br />Re: Additional Adequacy Items, ZMK Mine Construction, Inc., ZMK Gravel Pit, <br />File No. M-91-146 <br />Dear Mr. Larson: <br />After the site inspection January 16, 1992, of the proposed 2MK Gravel Pit, <br />the Division has the following additional concerns regarding the adequacy of <br />your limited impact permit application. Please address them separately at the <br />end of your response to the Division's adequacy letter dated January 13, 1992, <br />and refer to this letter. <br />Exhibit C - Mining Plan <br />~1~2 State how you will permanently mark the boundaries of the proposed <br />affected land in accordance with Rule 6.7(2). <br />X13 What are your plans to access the Phase II area from the west after the <br />river is diverted through the Phase I area? Describe how equipment <br />accessing the Phase II area will affect the quality of the river water <br />and the methods you will use to minimize disturbance to the river <br />including sediment containment. <br />°E~ <br />14. A low area exists on the west side, near the north end, of the proposed <br />Phase I area. It appears that a structure such as a riprapped berm would <br />be needed at this location to keep the river from flowing into a more <br />westerly channel. Please address this concern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.