My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE61089
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE61089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:46 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 7:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978107
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/17/1985
Doc Name
MONTEZUMAS CNTYS FN TOZER PIT M-78-107 MONTEZUMA CNTY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~- ~-- <br />~ ~'~' <br />,,.W <br />~~ <br />e~ ~ ~r~ Montezuma County Administrative Office <br />~/ I Room 3oz - Court~wuse <br />~ ~ f tog West Main Sheet <br />Crntez, Coltttado 8t3zt-3r8q <br />X303) 565-83 t7 <br />November 18, 1985 <br />Camille M. Farrell, Reclamation Specialist <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />423 Centennial Building <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Montezuma County's <br />File No.: Matthews Pit M-78-106-Montezuma County <br />Tozer Pit M-78-107-Montezuma County <br />Hindmarsh Pit M-78-108-Montezuma County <br />Seelig Pit M-78-109-Montezuma County <br />Lancaster Pit M-78-110-Montezuma County <br />Brewer Site M-78-111-Montezuma County <br />Wallace Pit M-83-tOL-Montezuma County <br />Answering your concerns, by Pit and Item No.: <br />Matthews Pit-M-78-106 <br />1. A. Yes <br />2. As indicated in our November 1, 1985 Annual Report <br />and Reclamation Plan, it is probable that the best <br />we can do for the slopes, with the limited amount <br />of spoil material that is left, is about 2:1. If <br />it is at all physically possible, xe will make the <br />finished slope flatter than 3:1, but until we actually <br />begin the operation, cannot guarantee the end product. <br />3. We do not intend to plant Indian Ricegrass nor Fourwing <br />Saltbush, since the flatter areas will be in corrals <br />and a bunchgrass like Ricegrass is counter-productive <br />to erosion control on the steeper slopes. Fourwing <br />Saltbush won't work at all on these slopes and will <br />_ serve no purpose in an 54~~L';~S~ding chute <br />area. ~~~ $ ~."..~~:~~d,%I <br />NOV 21 1985 <br />L'+olo. Dep#. a# a:hial R$SLU(Cb:; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.