My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60587
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60587
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:25 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:45:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997086
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/3/1998
Doc Name
OWL CANYON CULTURAL RESOURCE RECONNAISSANCE & PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />My name is Barbara Voss and I am respectfully asking for a continuance of <br />this meeting. We believe we have grounds for a continuance because: <br />1) The packet of information we have been given, including your staff report <br />is incomplete. You received items from the county public works only today. <br />You have not had time to properly review this information and none of the <br />parties involved have had time to review it either. <br />2 Your staff and Siloam Stone, We Applicant for the special use permit, have <br />had quite some time to review what information is available in your report. <br />The majority of those protesting this permit were notified only 10 days ago, <br />which has not been enough time to accurately study or obtain any survey we <br />require to oppose this permit. While we are ready this evening to make <br />various presentations, this is a huge undertaking with many issues and this <br />decision can not be made overnight. If the county and the applicant have <br />been given the time to prepare, we should be given adequate time as well. <br />3) We understand through a conversation between an attorney and Kim <br />Hadley that this board is also not aware of the archeological significance of <br />some of the property in question. <br />4) We would have brought these concerns to your attention earlier, except <br />we were informed by a member of your staff that we were prohibited from <br />contacting you or even knowing who you were because of the "sunshine <br />law". The attorney we have spoken with indicates this is not true. <br />5) We would like to invite each of you out to the site in question and show <br />you the property. Again, we are prepared to make presentations and show <br />photographs; however, it would be in the county's best interest for each of <br />you to actually see the property in question. <br />6) There are many people in attendance tonight who wish to speak. Perhaps <br />would best serve all parties, include the board, to deal with this situation in a <br />separate meeting. <br />Will you grant us a continuance? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.