Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br />with this lengthy period in which to supply a replacement, the operator still <br />had failed to submit a financial warranty, and thus the civil penalty <br />sanctions referred to by Mr. Mosch wer ;eased by the Board. Given the <br />potentially serious consequences of a ed cyanide operation and the very <br />high cost of reclamation of an a doped site, it certainly was not <br />unreasonable for the Beard to use the civil penalties, as authorized under the <br />statute, as a tool to encourage Compliance with the law. Unfortunately, after <br />almost eight months, we have yet to receive a new financial warranty for this <br />site. <br />Financial warranties required under the law for reclamation are a critical <br />part of our program and tfie protection of the state as a whole. The Board and <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division are very sensitive to the plight of the entire <br />mining community, especially the small miner ("mom and pop" operations) in the <br />area of reclamation bonding. The current law allows for a variety of <br />financial warranty types (bond, certificate of deposit, irrevocable letter of <br />credit, first deed of trust, etc.) and also assists the small operator by <br />limiting the warranty to E5, 000.00 for operations on less than ten acres <br />(E5,000.00 is often insufficient to reclaim these operations). <br />As a 1 egi sl ator, I am sure you are aware of the general i nsurance i ndustry <br />crisis regarding coverage of liabilities. Costs have risen, and in some cases <br />insurance bonding is simply unavailable. The Division and Board have adopted <br />a position of maintaining as much flexibility as possible, consistent with the <br />statute, while at the same time fulfilling our responsibility to protect the <br />interests of the citizens of Colorado. A solution to this problem is not easy <br />because of the larger insurance problem. I would be pleased to work on any <br />ideas you might have to resolve the difficulties in this area. <br />The case of Mr. Mosch illustrates that the Mined Land Reclamation statute <br />provides the Board with the necessary latitude to solve these problems. A <br />E200.00 bond for closure of a mine is certainly not excessive and demonstrates <br />that the Board responded to Mr. Mosch's concerns fairly and within their <br />statutory authority. <br />If you have any further questions about these issues or any other related to <br />Mined Land Reclamation, please do not hesitate to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />DAVID C. SHELTON <br />Director <br />DCSltmb <br />cc: 14r. Al Mosch <br />Ms. Diane Rees <br />Dave Cole <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />Greg Romberg <br />Clyde Plartz <br />6860E <br />