My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE60009
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
700000
>
PERMFILE60009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:07:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:31:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992069
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/16/1992
Doc Name
ADEQUACY RESPONSE M-92-069
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Lorraine Stepenske <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />October 15, 1992 <br />Page 3 <br />(b) The operator agrees to monitor the groundwater level in the <br />five monitoring wells and the two adjoining wells (if <br />permission is received) on a quarterly basis and will submit <br />this information to you in an annual report. We will begin <br />the monitoring before the operation begins so we can obtain <br />some baseline data. These above commitments constitute our <br />monitoring plan. <br />We still question the need to monitor temperature and <br />conductivity in each of the wells. The reason a temperature <br />reading would be needed escapes me. We discussed conductivity <br />giving some indication of possible suspended solids in the <br />groundwater and thus giving an indication of water quality <br />impacts to the groundwater from mining. <br />Please remember we are doing a dry mining operation and will <br />not have a lake with turbid waters which could push into the <br />groundwater. The groundwater to be monitored is the <br />groundwater that is already there but we expect it might be at <br />a lower level. We do not expect any increased suspended <br />solids because our mining operation has no way of introducing <br />this into the present groundwater. Therefore, we prefer not <br />to include temperature and conductivity in our monitoring <br />plan. <br />(r_J If recharge ponds are used, the operator will submit a design <br />for the ponds prepared by a professional engineer. Also we <br />will locate the ponds on Exhibit C and determine how these <br />ponds might affect the stability of dwellings. <br />9. Acknowledge <br />10. We accept your calculation of $56,702.09 as the amount of the <br />financial warranty. <br />11.. Acknowledge <br />12. Acknowledge <br />With this letter we are including a copy of the Substitute Water <br />Supply Plan and the well permit application. In previous <br />applications the submittal of this information has satisfied the <br />Exhibit G requirements because the State Engineer had been fully <br />informed of the affects of mining and measures to augment water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.