My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE59466
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE59466
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:45 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:18:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006046
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/1/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #1
From
DMG rmw
To
Silt Sand & Gravel LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Bill Roberts <br />Adequacy Review, Permit Application No. M-2006-046 <br />August 1, 2006 <br />22. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(2)(c), please submit a statement or plan showing how water from de-watering <br />operations or from runoff from disturbed azeas, piled material and operating surfaces will be managed to protect <br />against pollution of either surface or ground water both during and after the operation. <br />23. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(5), please affirmatively state that the applicant has acquired (or has applied for) a <br />National Pollution Dischazge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Water Quality Control Division at the <br />Colorado Department of Health. <br />24. Based on a review of the Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Maps, most of the proposed mining operation will take place <br />within the 100-yeaz floodplain of the Colorado River. Please describe the mitigation measures that will be <br />implemented to reduce the potential of the 100-year flood event from capturing the pit and causing off site damage. <br />Rule 6.4.10 Exhibit J -Vegetation Information <br />25. The applicant states that aCottonwood-dominated riparian azea exists at the northeastern fringe of the site and <br />wetlands/wet meadow areas are located at various locations across the site. The mining plan indicates that dewatering <br />will occur in all phases of the site. It is the Division's experience that a drop in ground water levels of less than two <br />feet can be fatal to cottonwoods. Please indicate how the cottonwoods and wetlands will be monitored and protected <br />from such impacts. <br />Rule 6.4.12 Exhibit L -Reclamation Costs <br />26. The Division will estimate the cost to reclaim the site once the applicant addresses the concerns noted in this and <br />subsequent letters. The Division will estimate a cost to reclaim the site based on the information submitted in the <br />application and responses to adequacy reviews. <br />Rule 6.4.13 Exhibit M -Other Permits and Licenses <br />27. Rule 6.4.13 requires the applicant to list other permits, licenses and approvals the Applicant holds or will be seeking <br />in order to conduct the proposed mining and reclamation operation. Exhibit M, as submitted, lists multiple types of <br />permits and approvals that are required for the project but does not indicate whether the applicant has applied for or <br />obtained them. Of particulaz concern to the Division are the storm water permit, gravel piUwell permit, substitute <br />water supply plan, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 and/or Nationwide permit. Please resubmit this exhibit <br />indicating the status for each permit or approval listed in this exhibit. <br />Rule 6.4.17 Exhibit O -Proof of Mailine of Nofices to Board of Countv Commissioners and Soil Conservation District <br />28. Pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(a)(ii), proof of notice shall be in the form of a return receipt of a Certified Mailing or date- <br />stamped copy of the notice acknowledging receipt by the appropriate local Boazd. Please submit the appropriate <br />Proof of Notice to the Board of County Commissioners and Soil Conservation District. <br />Rule 6.4.19 Exhibit S -Permanent Man-made Structures <br />29. In Exhibit S, the applicant commits to maintaining a setback of "...at least 200 feet from any permanent man-made <br />structure for which an agreement has not been obtained, until either a notarized agreement with the structure has been <br />obtained or an engineering analysis report has been prepared and submitted to the Division." in lieu of such <br />agreements and/or slope stability analyses, please revise Exhibit C-1, Mining Plan Map, to show setbacks of 200 feet <br />from structures for which the applicant has not obtained a notarized agreement from the structure owner, or has not <br />provided a slope stability analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.