My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58935
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58935
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:15 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:04:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981307
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/13/1982
Doc Name
BRODERICK AND GIBBONS FOUNTAIN PIT FILE 81-307
From
MLR
To
WESTERN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1, <br />STATE OFCOLO RADO RiCHAROD LA Mid Go~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII Ill <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Cientennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />January 13, 1982 <br />Mr. Frank M. Graham, Jr. <br />Western Paving Construction Co. <br />1900 W. 64th Avenue <br />P. O. Box 21649 <br />Denver, Colorado 80221 <br />RE: Broderick and Gibbons - "Fountain Pit" <br />Dur File 1181-307 <br />~Vt-e-v <br />Dear t1z*63ch~: <br />Z have completed my adequacy review of the application for a mining and <br />I ~ reclamation permit for the above captioned operation. I have several questions <br />and comments that I have organized on an exhibit-by-exhibit basis below. Any <br />exhibits or parts thereof not mentioned are considered to be adequate at this <br />time. <br />As you know, before the Board can consider this application, our Division. <br />must receive proof of the four sequential weeks of publication. As we <br />discussed over the telephone, the publication must be completed soon enough <br />for the 20-day comment period to ,pass in its entirety before this application <br />goes to the Board. If this cannon be accomplished, the IIoard consideration <br />will have to be continued from the February to the March meeting. The March <br />meeting is still within the 90-day time period; therefore you would not need <br />to request this continuance. Proof of notifications of adjacent Landowners must <br />also be received by our Division before Board consideration of the application. <br />Application Ztem 19 <br />As per our telephone conversation, 1 have typed "affirmed" into this <br />space on both copies of our application form. <br />Exhibit A <br />The north-to-south running eastern boundary of the affected land is <br />given as 2,625.99' long in this exhibit. On the premining map in <br />exhibit C it is given as 2,695.44' long. Which length is correct? <br />Otherwise, the legal description matches up fine with the map. <br />Exhibit C <br />I. Reference my comments concerning the premining map under Exhibit A <br />above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.