PERMFILE58909

• Permit No: M2004067
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 1/2/2007
• Doc Name: Notice of Appeal
• From: Colorado Court of Appeal
• To: MLRB
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

FEB-01-06 04:31 PM FROM-RL
[phone] T-673 P.005/02t F-836
Metro Aistrict Light poles, and utility lines along Colwadc highway 119 (Rules
6.4.4(i) and 6.5(4)).
i
(C) Has the Applicant identified all significant, valuable, and petrnanent man-made
structures within 200 feet of the proposed affected land? (Rule 6.4.19 -Exhib=r S.)
(D) Has the Applicant accurately identified and located on a map all surface and
groundwater resources on the affected land and adjaceut lands that maybe
affected by the proposed mining operation? (Rules 6.4.7 - Exhtbit G and 6.4.3(fj
-Exhibit CJ ;
(E) Has the Applicant submitted abrief statement or plan showing how water from
de-watering operations or runoff from the disturbed areas, piled material and
operating surfaces will be managed to protect against pollution of surface water
(and, if applicable, control pollution in a manner that is consistent with a water
i
quality dischazge permit), both during and after the operation? Specifically, are
potential impacts to North Clear Creek identified? (FcuIe 6.4.7(2)(c).)
(F) Has the Applicant provided an adequate assessment of the disturbances to the
i
prevailing hydrologic balance of the affected land and of the surrounding area and
to the quantity and quality of water in surface and Bound systems? (Rule 3.16.)
Specific issues are:
potential for contaminants to enter the interconnected fractures supplying the
water to the nearby wells impacting water quality;
potential for reduced yield from the wells;
potential for uranium mineralization to enter ground water via blasting and
mining activities; and
MMkR Board Order, M-2004-067