My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE58909
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE58909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:01:13 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 6:03:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/2/2007
Doc Name
Notice of Appeal
From
Colorado Court of Appeal
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEB-01-06 04;31Pfd FROt~RL 'x303 866 5303 T-6T3 P.004/02T F-636 <br />7, <br />withdrawn as patties. Gilpin County announced <br />withdrawing as a party because it had reached a <br />concerning utu~esolved issues. That agreement is <br />Stipulation of Applicant and County of Gilpin <br />Requirements ° The contents of the joint <br />it representative that it was <br />agreement with the Applicant <br />fortft in a pleading entitled "Ioint <br />County Permitting <br />were not incorporated into the <br />Boazd's order. Prior to the Fotinai Boazd Hearing, tfie parties met to attempt to resolve <br />other issues identified in the Board's prehearing conference order. As a result of that <br />informal meeting, the Division drafted conditions o$ stipulations concerning groundwater <br />monitoring, groundwater impacts and blasting. E <br />proposed conditions, the conditions were not ado, <br />considered the draft prehearing conference order. <br />detail below. <br />all parties did not agree to the <br />by the Board at the time it <br />conditions are set forth in greater <br />The issues set forth in the prehearing order, as revised, aze: <br />(A) Has the Applicant providedPre-Mining & Mining Plan Maps that accurately <br />show the location of the quarry entrance and all permanent man-made structures <br />within 200 feet of the quarry entrance (affected land)? (Rule 6.4.3 (b) -Exhibit <br />C.) <br />(B) Has the Applicant provided an appropriate blast vibration analysis and blasting <br />plan demonstrating that off-site areas will not be adversely affected by blasting? <br />At issue aze potential damages to: the Slack Hawk/Central City Sanitation <br />District's waste water Treatment Plant, sewage lines to the Cleaz Creek <br />Convenience Store (owned by Cleaz Creek Convenience LLC), Silver Dollar <br />MMRTt Boazd Order, M-2004-06~ <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.