PERMFILE58897

• Permit No: M1992060
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 9/11/1992
• Doc Name: LAGOON PIT FN M-92-060 NEW DECISION DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION
• From: MLRD
• To: CITY OF MONTE VISTA
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION
Department of Natural Resources
t373 Sherman St.. Room 215
Denver, CO 80203
303 866-3567
Fn x: 303 832.6106
September 11, 1992
Mr. Joe Kurys
Public Works Director
City of Monte Vista
720 1st Avenue
Monte Vista. CO 81144
Re: Lagoon Pit (File No. M-92-060) Review of Adequacy Response dated
September 9, 1992
Dear Mr. Kurys:
OF'~~(O
~_
Ne
• `~ r:a' .
~ /E76 ~
Ray Romer.
Governor
Michael B. Long,
Division Director
I have reviewed the above referenced response and continue to have the
following adequacy concerns.
Application Form
The Division's concern about the amount of affected area is addressed; the
City does not intend to affect more than 10 acres which qualifies it for a
110(2) permit. The size of the permit area, however, still remains a concern
since what is outlined on the Exhibit E maps as the permit area does not total
the 17 acres indicated on page 1 of the application form as the amount of
permitted acreage.
The applicant must resolve the differences in the acreage values given for the
permit area which appear on page 1 of the application form and the acreage
value apparent for the tract outlined on the Exhibit E maps. A revised page 1
should be provided if the tract indicated on Exhibit E maps is all that is to
be included in the permit area.
Notices
Your response included evidence of the publication in the Monte Vista Journal
of the notice of filing of the permit application on May 13, 1992. Apparently
a copy of the application was also received May 14, 1992 by the Rio Grande
County Clerk's office. The application first received by the Division on
June 3, 1992, however, consisted of only the first page of the application form
and was indicated to be incomplete by the Division in its letter to you dated
June 16, 1992. In that letter, you were advised that a complete application
was necessary and that if you had already initiated publication, you.would need
to republish in conjunction with the submittal of a complete application as
specified in Rule 3.2(3)(b>(iii>. The Division did not receive what it
considered to be a complete application until August 14, 1992.
Evidence of publication of the notice or" filing on or after the receipt of the
c~cmp12t9 application by the Division should be supplied and a 10 day period for
comment following that publication date should be specified in that notice.
Evidence of filing a complete application with the Ric Grande County Clerk's
office on or after the August 14, 1992 date should also be supplied.
STATEOF COLORADO