Laserfiche WebLink
41 <br />• 1 <br />2 <br />I <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />• <br /> <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />especially concerning the commitment to not allowing <br />for the standing water and whatever methods would be <br />implemented to ensure that does not occur .is <br />sufficient as well as having the augmentation plan <br />in hand would be sufficient to minimize an}r off-site <br />or adjacent impacts to local users, and again there <br />has not been any use indicated, and apparently none <br />is known at this point in time. <br />There has been some concern as far as <br />dust, pollution, and these comments would tie referred <br />over to the Department of Health's Air Quality <br />Control Division. <br />There's been concerns raisedi about <br />sedimentation of the Rito Seco, which I briefly <br />touched on, which we feel would be mitigated by the <br />use of the sediment traps below each of the major <br />facilities by the uses of ditches and berms adjacent <br />to the haul roads and the other facilities. <br />MR. HOLDER: Do we have good baseline <br />data on the stream's quality? <br />MR. RENNER: We have about a year's <br />worth of baseline information on the stream. <br />MR. HOLDER: Through all the seasons? <br />MR. RENNER: Yes, yes. There is also <br />a commitment to an ongoing monitoring plan for metals <br />