My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-10-07_PERMIT FILE - M1991123 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1991123
>
1991-10-07_PERMIT FILE - M1991123 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2025 1:25:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991123
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/7/1991
Doc Name
REGULAR OPERATION 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on the information available, the amount of water available <br /> would be 96 acre-feet. A substitute water supply plan would be <br /> used to administer these rights in the first year. The plan would <br /> use the Carr Tyler Ditch and the Tom Delehant Ditch as the source <br /> of water for replacement of consumptive uses attributed to the <br /> mining operation. <br /> !litigation Plan for wells Impacted by Dewatering <br /> The proposed mining operation will cause a cone of depression in <br /> the groundwater table. The dewatering of the pit would probably <br /> cause a lowering of the groundwater table to a distance ranging <br /> between 2, 000 to 2,500 feet. This is a rough estimate based on <br /> past experience in similar situations. There are some mitigating <br /> factors in the impacts because of other mining operations in the <br /> immediate vicinity. Western Mobile has a pit adjacent to the <br /> proposed mining operation that will intercept any drawdown impacts <br /> downstream. Boulder Creek lies very close to the west and will <br /> serve as a hydraulic barrier to any impacts. There are several <br /> wells identified on the USGS maps that were not found in the State <br /> Engineer's files. These wells may be non-permitted and existing or <br /> possibly abandoned. Based on the decrees and the locations of the <br /> wells in the area there would appear to be no more than two wells <br /> that could be impacted by the mining operation. <br /> The operator proposes the following steps will be taken to monitor <br /> groundwater levels and mitigate well owners that might be injured. <br /> 1 . Three monitoring wells will be installed to bedrock around the <br /> perimeter of the property. These wells will be used to measure <br /> fluctuations in the groundwater table during the mining <br /> operation. Readings would be taken on a monthly basis. <br /> Construction will consist of two inch diameter PVC slotted <br /> pipe with a gravel pack around the casing, locked cap, and <br /> sealed at the top from surface water contamination. <br /> 2 . Well owners would be notified of the mining operation and <br /> asked for permission to take initial readings on their wells <br /> for depth to groundwater. If permission is not granted, then <br /> estimates based on the State Engineer's records will have to <br /> be used. <br /> 3. In the event a well owner feels a well has been injured they <br /> may either contact the operator or the MLRD, the operator will <br /> examine the monitoring well records and the location of the <br /> claimed injury. The State Engineer's office will be given the <br /> opportunity to participate in the review. <br /> 4. If it is determined the well is injured due to the mining <br /> operation, then the operator will look at several options for <br /> mitigation. These options will be: <br /> G-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.