Laserfiche WebLink
1. Annual weed control activities and herbicide application (when conducted) <br />• ~ 2; Annual topsoil balance reporting ~ ' <br />.3. Revegetation monitoring report (when applicable) <br />4. ~ Updated existing light use road locations and culverts with specific light use road <br />culvert design calculations <br />5. Submittal of existi rig graded topography with comparison to proposed postmining <br />topography <br />6. ~ Wildlife monitoring reporting when conducted <br />Testing for Successful~Reclamation <br />The following discussion details 'the applicable success criteria, methods to be used in' <br />measurement of parameters, comparisons to be made between reclaimed and undisturbed <br />areas, and statistical tests to be performed. <br />An extended reference area approach will be used for assessing successful revegetation for <br />the parameters of cover and production at both the II-W and II-W South Extension areas. <br />Woody plant density and species diversity success criteria will be based' on technical <br />• performance standards. As discussed later in this section, seasonal variety as a success <br />parameter.is not applicable because of the cool season vegetation dominance in the native <br />' areas. In addition, premining data for the wetter phase of the mesic drainage type (Dry-Creek <br />area in II-W:~ Hubberson Gulch in the II-W South Extension areal will be used as success <br />standards for this minor type lin terms of areal~extentl. The proposed revegetation plan for <br />this mesic drainage, type should also be kept in mirid when considering revegetation success <br />criteria. "~ <br />In March 1965,'the Division issued Peabody a.set of adequacy comments based on.the review <br />of the Seneca II-W permit application. Included was a .comment regarding the then proposed <br />two-acre .reference areas and their' comparability to the permit area. In May, 1985, as part of a <br />Peabody response package, the extended reference area approach was proposed to alleviate . <br />the concerns of the Division. The appfoach and response were approved as part of the August <br />5, 1985 Decision and Findings of Compliance document for the Seneca II-W Mine permit. The <br />Seneca II-W permit was signed on December 31, 1985. <br />In response to Peabody's Permit Revision" 1 (PR 11 to the Seneca II' W permit, the Division <br />. ~ issued a Preliminary Adequacy Review letter on March 11, 1991 "which, in part, required <br />' documentation of the comparability of the extended reference area to the mine affected area. <br />Peabody responded to this requirement as part of an April 26, 1991 response package <br />' ~ ~ ~ 37 Revised 1 /99 <br />