Laserfiche WebLink
been completely graded and reclaimed. No reclamation costs have been • i <br />C included in fire handing calculations for this box cut area. <br />The above discussion has been incorporated into the narrative presented <br />on Pages 1Z-54 grid 12-54a. <br />The disturbance at the Wadge West pit, which includes Auger Area E, <br />consists of a final highwall to be reduced and associated spoil that has <br />been graded to resemble a pit that would require double highwall <br />reduction. At the solid waste area, existing fill material present on <br />bath sides of tfre site will require grading. <br />Tire bond estimate lras been revised to include the Wadge West pit in the <br />double friglrwall reduction cost section. The volume calculations <br />presented in Attachment 13-1 reflect these additions. Page 12-12 of Tab <br />12 has been revised to reflect the above discussion. <br />C Since the work required to reclaim the solid waste site consists of only • <br />grading, the costs for this area are appropriately included in the <br />miscellaneous grading section of the calculations. The acreage figure <br />in Table 13-6 has been revised to show 20.5 acres. Approximately half <br />of this area has been previously graded. Thus, the presented acreage <br />reflects a conservative estimate. <br />COMMENT: <br />C. "Left Open" Wadge Pit <br />Based upon the information contained in the revised permit renewal <br />application, it is unclear as to the disposition of the box cut and <br />other spoils generated during development of this pit. PCC needs <br />to describe the present location and condition of all spoil <br />material generated in this area, and clarify the plan for <br />completing backfilling and grading activities. The discussion <br />provided should include a clear description of how development of <br />the 4ladge east pit relates to tfre backfilling and grading plan for <br />the "left open" pit. . <br />30 <br />