My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_PERMIT FILE - M1981302 (36)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
_PERMIT FILE - M1981302 (36)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 2:59:16 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:35:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
PROPOSED OPERATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
999 <br /> PROPOSED OPERATIONS <br /> Gravel Resources Dj-3d2- <br /> In the Boulder valley the highest quality sand and gravel <br /> deposits are found along the historic floodplains of Boulder <br /> Creek and South Boulder Creek. Other rock deposits are found <br /> such as the deposits at Rocky Flats , the cap gravels <br /> found on some hilltops and the mountains themselves , but <br /> all of these alternative deposits are inferior to the river <br /> gravels from either a quality or a cost standpoint. The <br /> river gravels vary from almost no useable gravel to depths <br /> of over 20 feet with the preponderance of gravel depths <br /> being 12 feet or less . <br /> • <br /> The ownership of these gravel bearing lands is highly <br /> fragmented due to the urban development which has occurred <br /> on them and due to the historically small size of the river <br /> bottom farms in the as yet undeveloped areas. <br /> Total gravel usage in Boulder county depends upon the <br /> amount of development, redevelopment and maintenance which <br /> occurs in any given year: The quantity of gravel used from <br /> all producers in the county in 1979 likely exceeded 2 million <br /> • tons. Usage in 1980 probably did not equal 1979 levels <br /> due to budget constraints and lessened demand for new <br /> �� B-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.