My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57497
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:28:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/30/2002
Doc Name
Letters from Concerned Citizens
From
DMG
To
GCC Rio Grande Inc.
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />5446 Stonemoor Dr. ~~ <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81005 <br />April 25, 2002 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br /> <br />APR 2 9 2~2 <br />Diaision of Minerals and Geology <br />Dear Sirs: <br />This letter is to comment on the Reclamation Permit application by Rio Grande Portland <br />Cement Company. I comment as a resident of Puebio County who is concerned. <br />I am concerned, no, I worry about the potential impact on wildlife. <br />The application contains no study or documentation for a baseline of what wildlife and <br />habitat are there now and makes no provision for restoring either. Yet biologists have <br />estimated that the Greenhorn Creek WeNand zone, the riparian habitat, and surrounding <br />area are home to 250 species of animals. <br />Even though the proposed blasting agent is highly tobc, there is no analysis of fts travel <br />patterns. There isn~ evert a mention of the total amounts to be used. What about its <br />to:ac effects on the surrounding water, the soil, and the animals? What will its effects <br />be on the fish? The application doesn~ say. <br />The actual blasting and mining effects on wildlife are not mentioned, erther. <br />The proposed operation will be highly detrimental to wildlife, yet no provision is made to <br />undo, to reclaim, what wilt have been lost. <br />Wildlife is an asset for ail of us in Puebio County-an asset that a corporation should nat <br />he permitted to disregard for the sake of its own interests. <br />Sincerely, ~ <br />Herzberger <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.