My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE57469
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE57469
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:28:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 10 VEGETATION TECHNICAL REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larerttila Canyon Mine -Vegetation Techtim( ReOOrt <br />• plants or succulents) at least half-way in the quadrant were clipped and bagged. The contents of <br />the bags were weighed to the nearest 0.1 gram. Sample adequacy was calculated in the field using <br />the Snedecor-Cochran sample adequacy formula described above. <br />Sensitive Species of Plants <br />Information was gathered on sensitive species of plants that may potentially occur within the <br />permit area. Initially, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Colorado Natural <br />Heritage Program (CNHP) were contacted for lists of species and concerns about the mine upon <br />these sensitive species. The USFWS identified no threatened or endangered plants for the permit <br />area, but identified concerns for three species of special concern plants. These plants include <br />Smith whitlow-grass (Dra6a smithit), Colorado green gentian (Frasera coloradensis), and sandhill <br />goosefoot (Chenopodium cyc[oides) (Carlson, 1996). Although special concern species presently <br />have no legal protection under the Endangered Species Act, they were considered within the spirit <br />of the Act and effects to them and their habitats were addressed. CNHP has no sensitive plant <br />concerns for the permit area (Grunau, 1996). <br />SECTION 3 -RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Community Descriptions <br />• Vegetation communities have been mapped within the entire permit area, including those areas not <br />proposed for disturbance. A vegetation community map is presented in Map 2.04.10-1. A plant <br />species list of those species encountered on the site during these investigations is provided in <br />Appendix V-1. <br />Two primary vegetation community types, including oak/pinyon pine and grassland, were <br />identified within the proposed disturbance areas. Two other community types including riparian <br />and hay meadow would have limited dismrbance of less than one acre from road and railroad <br />access into the property. Other communities, including mountain shrub, coniferous forest, and <br />pinyon/juniper woodland, were documented outside of these potential disturbance areas but within <br />the permit boundary. Table V-1 presents the community type acreages within the permit boundary <br />with proposed disturbances. <br />Oak/Pinyon Pine <br />Along the eastern slope, Gambel oak and mountain mahogany mix to form a narrow, <br />discontinuous band between the lower edge of the ponderosa pine forest and upper margin of the <br />grasslands and pinyon/juniper woodlands (Mute) and Emerick, 1984). These species extend <br />downward and mix with pinyon pine predominantly. Juniper is less common on the site. Gambel <br />oak requves warmer climate, deeper soils, and more moisture than does mountain mahogany. The <br />. project area characteristics favor Gambel oak and it dominates this community type. Pinyon pine <br />Veg.475/April z~, (em 4 (revised 4/21/97) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.