Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jeffrey Clark <br />September 11, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />2,290 feet, and the distance from the centroid of the exposed surface water areas to the Big <br />Thompson River is approximately 720 feet. Lagging of both depletions and accretions have been <br />accounted for at the gravel pit and the settling pond, respectively. Because this is a new proposed <br />mining operation, no groundwater was exposed at this location prior to January 1, 1981. <br />You have provided a monthly breakdown of the maximum annual depletions totaling 0.37 <br />acre-feet of evaporative loss from a maximum of 0.16 acres of exposed groundwater at a settling <br />pond and 5.89 acre-feet of water losses associated with the extractioh of an estimated 200,000 <br />tons of aggregate from below the water table. Dust suppression on the site will be met by water <br />imported from another location. No phreatophyte credit has been applied to this plan. <br />Replacements <br />The operator proposes to provide replacement water for the actual operational depletions <br />from a portion of a 200 acre-foot lease agreement with the City of Loveland. This 25-year lease <br />was originated in January 1998 and extends through December 31, 2022. The fully consumable <br />water that is offered by the City of Loveland includes, but is not limited to, native water from the <br />Big Thompson River basin as stored within the City's reservoir system, Windy Gap Water, or any <br />water subsequently acquired by the City. A transit loss of 1.8% will be charged for the delivery of <br />this water to the subject site. This agreement with the City extends beyond the approval period <br />of this SWSP. The monthly evaporative and operational losses and proposed monthly <br />replacement requirements for the approved year of depletions at this gravel pit can be found on <br />the attached Tables 2, 4 and 5. The City of Loveland lease is also used for the Green/Croissant <br />Pit and Baer Pit. <br />As required by Section 8 of Senate Bill 89-120, this substitute water supply plan has been <br />provided to an outside consultant for review. The consultant has recommended approval of the <br />plan by way of a draft of this letter. Based upon statutory requirements and the <br />recommendations of the consultant, I hereby approve the proposed substitute water supply plan <br />in accordance with C.R.S. § 37-90-137(11), subject to the following cdnditions: <br />Conditions of Approval <br />1. This substitute water supply plan shall be valid for the period of September 1, 2007 through <br />August 31, 2008, unless othervvise revoked, modified, or superseded by decree. This plan will <br />be extended until August 31, 2009, if the applicant provides updated tables with the <br />current depletions at the site and confirmation to this office, the water commissioner and <br />the division office by August 31, 2008 that the City of Loveland has adequate physical <br />water supplies available to cover the 2008-2009 gravel pit depletions. <br />2. If this plan will not be made absolute by a water court action by the plan's expiration date, a <br />renewal request must be submitted to this office with the statutory fee (currently $257) no later <br />than July 16, 2008 or July 16, 2009, subject to the requirements of condition 1 above. <br />3. A well permit must be issued for the gravel pit in accordance with C.R.S. § 37-90-137(2) and <br />(11), prior to the exposure or use of groundwater. A well permit application has been submitted <br />to this office (receipt no. 3613225) and this application is currently pehding evaluation. The <br />provisions of C.R.S. § 37-90-137(2) prohibit the issuance of a permit for a well to be located <br />within 600 feet of any existing well, unless the State Engineer finds that circumstances so <br />warrant after a hearing held in accordance with the procedural rules in 2CCR402-5. This <br />hearing may be waived if you are able to obtain statements from the owners of all wells within <br />600 feet, verifying that they have no objection to your use of the proposed well. Should a new <br />