PERMFILE57303

• Permit No: M1988112
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 3/22/1989
• Doc Name: MINUTES
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

-118-
MR. BANTA: And I thing just to add -- to add to that though is that, in
terms of the policies of the Board with respect to other statutes and
agencies, is that the Board has been very careful not to assume the
responsibility of waiting until, say they have a point source permit or as
what happened last year in SB 162, that no longer do we have to or is the
Board to wait until county approval has come about. But those processes are
clearly separated, otherwise the Board would end up with a job of
administering not only his own statute but numerous other statutes and we
would be forced into the position having to make recommendations to the Board
with respect to other laws and compliances for which we're not capable or
prepared to do.
MR. HOLDER: I think the legislative intent is clear and if this
gentleman would like to join me in lobbying fora change, I'm ready.
• MR. JOUFLAS: Dean?
MR. MASSEY: Just for the purposes of record, I think to the extent that
any further inquiry by the Board is necessary, the Board has just conducted
that inquiry. Additional information on physical sources has been provided
into the record. It's testimony reflecting the fact that there is water
available, that negotiations are under way is a matter of record.
Specifically, who and where is proprietary information and really not
pertinent to the inquiry at this time. That's appropriate under Colorado
Water Law, that's where we'll be. So, for the purposes of complying with that
regulation, I would submit that the inquiry and discussion we just had and the
evidence on record is adequate, not only complete but adequate for your
approval.
MR. DANIELSON: Could you live with a -- could you live with a condition
in the permit that said that there should be no ground disturbance until you
submit whatever water rights you get or is that going to...?
•