My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56912
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:59:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 5:14:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/9/1984
Doc Name
SURFACE ROCK PIT FN M-84-001
From
MLRD
To
JOHN D & MARILYN M SCHMAHL
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT D MINING PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />for. and ivlrs. Schmahl -3- January 9, 191 <br />5. Will any fertilizers be used on the site? Please specify type <br />o~ 6. To what depth will topsoil be spread on the different parcels? <br />C. Exhibit H - wildlife Information <br />1. Please provide this exhibit at the earliest convenience. <br />D. Exhibit C - Soils Information <br />1. The information provided for this exhibit is lacking in detai <br />operator needs to provide a breakdown of the different soil horizoi <br />at this site and the suitability of these horizons for topsoil sal' <br />purposes. If possible, those areas where topsoil is suitable for <br />should be depicted on Exhibit C map. <br />E. Ehibit J - 'Jegetation Information <br />'ii <br />1. The operator has provided an inventory for only Section 10, ev n though <br />areas in Section 9, 15, and 16 are being permitted. The operator ust provide <br />site specific vegetation inventories on all areas to oe permitted. <br />F. Exhibit L - Reclamation Costs <br />1. The Division, at this time, cannot review this exhibit for ode <br />the lack of detail provided. The operator must breakdown the cost <br />reclaiming this site pursuant to Rule 2.12(12) of the Rules and Re <br />Along with this cost breakdown, the operator must specify the maxi <br />(eg.: pit area, process site, access road, etc.) to be disturbed a <br />time. The operator needs to provide this information because thes <br />reclamation costs are the basis for the financial warranty amount <br />posted by the operator prior to the issuance of apennit. This fi <br />warranty is held by the Division and will be released upon success <br />reclamation of the site. However, if tite operator is unable to re <br />site, the Division would pull the financial warranty and reclaim t <br />This is why detailed reclamation costs and the proposed maximum ac <br />disturbed at any one time must be proved by the operator. <br />G. Exhibit "4 - Local Government Approval <br />and rate. <br />The .A <br />s occurring ~ ~y <br />age <br />alvaging <br />acy due to <br />for <br />lotions. <br />m acreage <br />any one <br />proposed <br />at must be <br />ncial <br />1 <br />aim the <br />site. <br />s to be <br />1. When are the Mesa County Commissioners scheduled to consider y ur <br />~~- application? Please provide proof of compliance with local zoning at the <br />`~',/~ earliest convenience. <br />H. Miscellaneous <br />~l. Please provide proof of newspaper notification, pursuant to Rul 2.2 of <br />the Rules and Regulations, at the earliest convenience. <br />2. At the earliest convenience, please provide proof of adjacent landowner <br />notification pursuant to Rule 2.2 of the Rules and Regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.