My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE56259
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE56259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:52 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:59:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/17/2001
Doc Name
PRE-HEARING ORDER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />III. ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED <br />Presentations to the Board shall be strictly limited to the issue of whether the pending <br />application complies with the requirements of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the <br />Extraction of Construction Materials ("Construction Materials Act"), Section 34-32.5-101 <br />et sec ., C.R.S., as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder by the <br />Board. The parties shall limit presentations to the question of whether the pending <br />application should be approved or denied, based on the issues stated below. <br />The issues to be considered were all raised by objectors in a timely fashion during the <br />public comment and Informal Conference phases, and were narrowed and clarified at the <br />Pre-hearing Conference. <br />1. Have all appropriate agencies been notified of the application and have all <br />comments and/or recommendations been considered by the Division staff? <br />2. Have all parties been adequately notified and will they be adequately notified in the <br />future? <br />3. Has the agent for the applicant been candid and forthright? <br />4. Is the wildlife statement adequate and complete? <br />5. Does the application contain an adequate weed control plan? <br />6. Has the applicant applied for or stated his intention of applying for all other <br />applicable permits? <br />7. Is the reclamation plan complete and adequate? <br />8. Is the proposed reclamation bond adequate? <br />9. Will the operation create adverse impacts to water quality? <br />10. Will the operation create adverse impacts to hydrologic balance, including <br />wetlands and f/ood p/ain issues? <br />11. Should Temporary Cessation be prohibited at this site? <br />12. Has the staff been biased in its review of the application? <br />13. Do the Division and Board have broad police powers such that they are required to <br />address each and every objection to the application? <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.