My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO24575
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO24575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:35 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:48:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/4/1999
Doc Name
RATIONALE FOR PUBLIC NOTICE
Permit Index Doc Type
NPDES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II <br />Page No. 24 <br />Permit Na. CO-0045161 <br />B. RESPONSIBILITIES <br />5. iVfnditication Suspension. Revocation, or Termination of Permits By the Division (continued) <br />(.4) The permi[ condition requested to be modified was based on a promttl_eated effluent limitation guideline, EPA <br />approved water quality standard, or an effluent limitation sec forth in 5 CCR 1002-62, § 62.4 et seq.; and <br />(B) EPA has revised, withdrawn, or modified that portion of the regulation or effluen[ ]imitation guideline on <br />which the permi[ condition was based, or has approved a Commission action with respec[ to the water quality <br />sandazd or effluen[ limitation on which the permit condition was based; and <br />(C) The permittee requests modification after the notice of final action ty which the EPA effluen[ limitation <br />guideline, water quality standard, or effluen[ limitation is revised, withdrawn, or modified; or <br />(D) For judicial decisions, a court of competen[ jurisdiction has remanded and stayed EPA promulga[ed <br />regulations or effluen[ limitation guidelines, if the remand and stay concern that portion of the regulations or <br />guidelines on which the permit condition was based and a request is filed by the permittee in accordance with <br />this Regulation, within ninety days of judicial retttand. <br />iv. The Division determines that good cause ezisa to modify a permit condition because of events over which the <br />permittee has no control and for which there is no reasonable available rt:medy. <br />v. The permittee has received a variance. <br />vi. When required to incorporate applicable tonic effluent limitation or srandazds adopted pursuant [o § 307(a) of the <br />Federal act. <br />vii. When required by the reopener condttiops in the permi[. <br />viii. As necessary under 40 CFR 403.8(e), [o include a compliance schedule for the development of a pretreatment <br />program. <br />ix. When [he level of dischazge of any pollutant which is not limited in the permit exceeds the level which can be <br />achieved by the [ethnology-based treatment regtrirements appropriate to the permittee under Section 61.8 (2) of <br />the Colorado Discharge Permit System Regulations. <br />x. To establish a pollutant notifica[ion level required in Section 61.8 (5) of the Colorado Discharge Permit System <br />Regulations. <br />zi. To correct technical mistakes, such as errors in calculation, or mistaken interpretations of law made in <br />determining permit conditions, to the ez[rnt allowed in Section 61.10 of the Colorado Dischazge Permit System <br />Reguladops. <br />zii. When required by a permit condition to incorporate a land application pl<w for beneficial reuse of sewage sludge, <br />to revise an existing land application plan, or to add a land application plan. <br />xiii. For any other cause provided in Section 6l. IO of the Colorado Dischazge Petit System Regulations. <br />c. Ac the request of a permittee, the Division may modify or terminate a permit and issue a new permi[ if the following <br />conditions aze met: <br />i. The Regiotud Administrator has been notified of the proposed modification or termina[ion and does not objet[ in <br />writing within thirty days of receipt of no[ification, <br />ii. The Division finds that the permittee has shown reasonable grounds consisten[ with the Federal and State <br />iii. Requirements of Section 61.1 of the Colorado Discharge Perini[ System Regulations have been met, and <br />iv. Requirements of public nonce have been me[. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.