Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Water Quality Control Diri,cion <br />Rationale - Puge l?, Permit No. CO-0034/42 <br />Table V/-4 -Federal <br />Parameter Lim/6~tions <br />30 Day Avg Concentration Daily Maa: Concentration <br />pH, .c. u. (minimum -maximum) <br />---6.0 - 9.0°- <br />Settleable Solids, m~/~7' N/A O.s <br />• Thi.c parumeter.cubjecr to Burden ojProojRequirements, see ne.rt.cection <br />Alternate Limitation Burden o(Proo(Reguiremen[s: /r, conformance wuh 40 CF,4 434.63, the pennutee hnr the <br />burden ojproojwhen requesting r'eliejfi~om .cetdenhle.colirlr limitarion.r. Relicf.citnll be grunted only when <br />necersnrp and .clmll no! be granted when Nte permittee has control over [he discharge. The permittee should <br />endeavor to meet the primnn~ lirnitntion.r whenever po.ccihle. This relieji.c available only jor,curfuce rmaffaarfnl/c <br />(004, 007, 009, 0/ l - 02I). <br />For rainfall. !o waive.cettleable.colidc lirnitulions, it is nececcnrv !o prove that discharge occurred within 4R houcc <br />after precipitation grenterlhun the l0-year, 24-hoar event has.clopped. <br />For snotvmell, to waive .cetdenble solids limimtlons, i( i.c necescar~• to prove that n'i.ccharge occurred within 4R )tours <br />after pond inflow volume greater then the /0-yew, 24-hour event ltnc stopper/. <br />The Division .shall determine d,e adequacy ojpraof. As port ojthis determination, the Division .chin! evaluate <br />whether the permittee could hove conn-o/led the di.cchurge in such n mannc r that primary limitations cotdd hm•e <br />been met. Al/ manual pond dewatering must meet .settleable solids /imitnrion.c. <br />c. Pollutants Limited by Water OualiN Standards: No potlu(ar,ts were limited by tenter quality stundurdc, with the <br />exception of pH for susf rce rmoJjdischnrges (ourfitlLc 004. 007. 009, 0/ 1 - 01 /J. <br />For outjuls 003. 011 and 024, for the parmneterc shown in Table V/-2, the rna.cs balance equation ,shown in V/.A.1 <br />wn.c used to culadnte the allowable effluen! lbnimtions that x~ould not cnu.ce the wnlcr yunliN,cmndards to be <br />violated. These limi[ntion.c ore shown us the vnluec for M1 in Table vl-6. The vahtes for Q,. Qz and Q+ for cl+ronic <br />and acute limitations, token from section /l/.B.2. ojthi.c rationale, and used in the culculation.c for water quality <br />limited pnrnmeteec are shown in Table V/-s. <br />Table VI-5 --Acute and Chronic Flows lWilliams Fork River) <br />Flow Acute (/E3) Chronic (30E3) <br />Q, 42 cfc 4R cfc <br />Q, 6?a cfr 6?4 cfc <br />Q, 4R?a cfr sa.24 ~jr <br />The rotas jar Qt, the design capacity, i.c .specified n.r the combined mua~irnurn flou• fw outfn!lr 003, 022, and 024 <br />The permittee has stored drat the mtal combined flow will not exceed 2800 gpm or 4.03 MGD (6.24 cfc). <br />Vnluec for h1/ and d1f vary depending on the bnekground stream yuuliry data (M, ~ and the applicable tenter yaaliry <br />standard (Mr). Values for Mr ore provided in Table ll/-3. h1r vnluec are slrown in Treble Vl-6 nlmtg with the <br />cnleulntcd effluent limitations (M~ for Outjnlls 003. 012, and 024. <br />