Laserfiche WebLink
A brief evaluation of the total projected impact from a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event is illustrative of the <br />effectiveness of chisel plowing and contour furrowing techniques. The projected precipitation from a 10-year, 24- <br />hour rainfall event is 1.8 inches, or 6,534 cubic feet per acre. <br />The water detention capacity of reclaimed sites prepared with both chisel-plowing and contour furrowing <br />techniques amounts to 5,121 cubic feet per acre, or 78% (1.41 inches) of the projected 10-year, 24-hour rainfall <br />event. Therefore, the total amount of water capable of becoming surface runoff from a rainfall event of this <br />magnitude is only .39 inches. <br />Research recently conducted at Energy Mine No. 1 and at the Edna Mine demonstrates that a reasonable estimate <br />for infiltration of water on reclaimed land is 85% of detention capacity (McWhorter 1979; John Gilley, USDA-SEA <br />unpublished data). Hence, the infiltration potential of reclaimed lands within the proposed permit azea is 1.19 <br />inches or approximately three times greater than total potential surface water runoff (.39 inches) from a 10-year, 24- <br />hour rainfall event. Consequently, the detention capacity and infiltration potential of reclaimed lands taken <br />together, will allow all rainfall to be potentially available for plant growth, and will minimize runoff from reclaimed <br />lands. <br />The aforementioned surface treatments are designed to reduce overland flow of water and shall be supplemented by <br />techniques suggested by Clyde, et al., (1978) if the need arises. The techniques recommended by these <br />researchers include the use of bamers, check dams, erosion stops, matting and roughened surfaces. These <br />treatments can be implemented with various kinds of straw bales, nettings and mattings to effectively reduce <br />overland flow. If results of the annual rill and gully survey indicate excessive erosion has occurred, Twentymile <br />Coal Company will initiate remedial measures. Gullies may be blocked with one of the above-mentioned <br />treatments to provide the opportunity for natural stabilisation through the growth of vegetation. Corrective actions, <br />where needed, will be completed by October 31 of the year following the survey. <br />• Since the intent of Rule 4.14.6 is to allow stabilization through means other than regrading, every alternative means <br />will be employed prior to using machinery to alleviate an erosion problem. If such action becomes necessary, one <br />of the small rubber-tired farm tractors utilized in reclamation will be allowed on the site to re-grade the gully. Once <br />a site is regraded, it will immediately be planted to the appropriate perennial seed mixture. <br />Details concerning the backfilling and soil stabilization of the Fish Creek Tipple operation are found within <br />Volume VII, Fish Creek Tipple/Loadout Appendix, on pages 2.05-33 through 2.05-37. <br />02 .0 5~ `~ ~~~ (d) A plan for removal from storage and redistribution of topsoil, subsoil, and other material to <br />meet the reouirements of 4.06. <br />RESPONSE <br />The location and volume of all stockpiled topsoil materials are shown on Map 29, Reclamation. <br />Topsoil stockpiles are located on stable surface areas where the likelihood of disturbance or contamination by the <br />mining operations is minimal. Stabilization of the storage piles has been achieved with one of the perennial seed <br />mixtures. <br />In the event that the side slopes of the revegetated topsoil stockpiles do not become adequately vegetated, then <br />alternate methods may be used far stabilizing the side slopes. The slopes may be reduced to facilitate revegetation <br />or an erosion netting or a geotextile may be placed over areas that are not adequately revegetated. <br />• <br />APPROVED APR 2 q 2000 <br />Permit Renewal No. 3 2.05-107 4/1/99 <br />