My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55140
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55140
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:27:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 07 GROUNDWATER TECHNICAL REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lorencim Canvcn .Mine -Groundwater Technira! Report <br />• <br />pipe and allowed to cure. Each borehole was drilled using a 7-7/8 inch drill bit. Coring was <br />performed in some areas with a 5-5/8 inch drill bit drilling to the core point, and a 4-7/8 inch core <br />barrel utilized to cut the core. During the drilling for each hole, lithologic logs were prepared by <br />a geologist. Following the drilling to the total depth of each hole, a suite of electric logs was ran <br />including gamma ray, caliper, micro-resistivity, resistivity, and density suites. Copies of these <br />logs are included in the geology exhibit within this permit. During the drilling operation, any <br />presence of water encountered was noted. <br />• <br />To determine the presence of alluvial aquifers, wells were installed in the alluvium of major <br />canyons within the permit area. Four wells were installed in Lorencito Canyon, and two wells in <br />Cow Canyon, with the other canyons having one well installed near the canyon mouth. A total <br />of ten wells were installed. Each of these wells were installed by methods similar to those <br />described above, except the wells did not have electric logging or coring performed. Most wells <br />were installed with ten feet of screen and generally do not exceed thirty feet in depth. Construction <br />diagrams and well logs are included in Appendix GW-1. Alluvial wells were assigned names <br />based upon location. Each well was designated with an MW prefix, followed by a two or three <br />letter code for the canyon the well was located in, and a number to designate the location with the <br />numbers increasing up the canyon. A summary of this nomenclature for all monitoring points is <br />included as Table GW-2. <br />TABLE GW-2 <br />LORENCITO CANYON MINE <br />SUMMARY OF SITE NOMENCLATURE <br />Abbreviation T e of Station Abbreviation Location of Station <br />MW Monitor Well LC Lorencito Canyon <br />WM Windmill JC Jeff Canyon <br />P Pond LPC Little Pine Canyon <br />SP Spring CYC Coyote Canyon <br />None Surface Water BC Bonita Canyon <br /> PC Puertecito Canyon <br /> AC Alamosa Canyon <br /> CC Chimney Canyon <br /> CWC Cow Canyon <br /> UD Unnamed Drainage <br />Consolidated rock wells were installed in boreholes following the logging or coring operations. <br />Wells were installed in both the Ciruela and Primero Coals, and within the overburden, <br />interburden, and underburden zones. In general, no aquifers (flow > 5 gpm) were noted during <br />• drilling. Screening intervals for the wells were installed according to the lithology encountered <br />Groundwatcr.475\Dcccmber 9, 1996 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.