My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55021
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:57 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:25:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/9/1978
From
PLEASANT VALLEY ASSOCIATION
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• III 'I~'IIIII"II'II <br />PLEASANT VALLEY <br />ASSOCIATION ~39 North ;1st <br />Colorado Springs, sss <br />CO 8090k <br />January 3r 1978F~ECE1~~~~ <br />The Colorado Mine Land Reclamation Board <br />1313 Sherman street JAN ' 9 1978 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />PJIINED LF,ND RECLAMA"CiON <br />Dear Sirst Ce!o. )ept. o± F!atural Resaress <br />The Pleasant Valley Association is a homeowner's organization of approximately <br />1000 paid members representing the residents of the developed area immediately <br />south of the Castle Concrete's Queens Canyon Quarry in Colorado Springs, Recently <br />the Board of the Pleasant Valley Association surveyed the membership co~icerning <br />the quarry operation at Queens Canyon, and based on that survey we would like to <br />advise you of their opinions and concerns. <br />While most PVA members recognize the need for this type of mining operation for <br />the economic well-being of our community, they have expressed fear that the present <br />mining area will not be properly reclaimed to correct the scar that now exists. <br />Like the majority of Colorado Springs residents, they strongly object to the <br />unsightliness of the Castle Concrete mining operation - a situation that most feel <br />has gone far beyond the possibility of aesthetic reclamation. <br />Since we live closest to this quarry, there are many times when high winds blow <br />the fine dust from the quarry to our residential area. If adequate reclamation <br />is not pursued, we fear that this blowing dust will continue well beyond the time <br />when the mining ceases. Then we shall have to unjustly bear the blunt of the <br />reclamation expense through increased taxes. This is not to mention the problem <br />of debris left on our roads by the many trucks leaving the quarry and violating <br />local traffic ordinance, of which, of course, you have no control. <br />We are also concerned about the large volume of fine crushed rock that is presently <br />just pushed over the sides of the mountain, and the silting ponds and dams that <br />exist within that area. Since we are subject to very heavy rains, what ,could happen <br />to our homes should this loose material slide, form a temporary dam, the~i burst <br />sending a deluge of water, rock and mud upon our community? Who will assume the <br />liability for the destruction of our homes? <br />We believe there are many questions that need to be addressed before the permit <br />for continuing quarrying operation is granted. Some of these questions Ne would <br />like to see addressed are listed below <br />Firsts What can be done to stabilize the fine material that <br />is presently on the sides of the mountain so as not to <br />have it move during heavy rain and thus slide and <br />possibly form a temporary and unstable dam. <br />Seconds Can the silt ponds be properly stabilized after the <br />mining ceases so as not to pose a threat to our homes <br />in years to come? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.