PERMFILE54686

• Permit No: M1983033
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 6/23/1983
• Doc Name: WALSTRUM QUARRY COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAND USE LAWS
• From: CNTY OF CLEAR CREEK
• To: MLRD
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

J , I~ • •
Clear Creek County Planning Commission
Record of Proceedings
Maly 16, 1983 Page 5
Dtr. Ball moved, Mfr. Dalpes seconded and it laas voted, with Dlr. Kenney
abstaining, that the Planning Commission recommend to the Boarcl of
County Commissioners that the Frei Rezoning Request (Case N132)
be approved with the following conditions:
1) that the perimeter of the floor be designated as a building
envelope within which X11 buildings and operations will be
confined except mining and reve etation;
2) that an indication of the intent to provide employee parking
across Hightiaay 6 on the Texaco Placer be indicated on the
Official Development Plan;
3) that the fact that the legal descriptions on the plat which
describe the property as two parcels is intended only for
zoning purposes and does not accomplish approval of division
of the property into those two parcels for purposes of
conveyance be included on the plat;
4) that the revegetation of the property be inspected by the
Colorado Division of {4ildlife once yearly for five years and
thereafter once each five years, or more often at the discretion
or the Division, to assess need for further County revieLa;
S) that a platting condition be added to prohibit the operator or
property owner from interfering with the existing jeep trail
or the existing streambed to the southwest of the property or
the existing drainage system; and
6) that once the Official Development Plan is presented in its final
form, the Commission delegates to Peter Kenney, Chairman of
tiLe Commission, the authority to sign the plat following his
confirmation of compliance with the above listed stipulations.
Dlr. Kenney resumed chairmanship of the meeting.
REQUEST TO DIVIDE LAND (Case b1-83-AX
Mr. {Peav~' reported that contact with the Department of Highways
resulted i confirmation that at the time of the condemnation of
right-of-way or I-70, no compensation was paid to,:{he then property
owners to comp'1?nsate for damages, thereby indicating that there was
no presumption of.~any condemnation of future us~'for t1Le portion of
the property remaiPning south of the highway. ,
'..
In response to a question from Dlr. hall, i`tr. {Veaver explained that
t1Le Robertsons have approached the Board of Adjustment regarding a
possible variance for this',property to'build on less than one acre
and the Board Baas unable to 'identify any potential problems with
regard to granting such a variance'. Dlr. l4eaver noted that the
purchaser of the property could apply to r_he Board of Commissioners
for an agreement to allow construction of a septic system line
across the Alvarado Road right-of-L,ray should it not be possible to
site a well and septic system on the same side of the road and still
maintain the minimum separation between the two.
:~OLLOIJing~LlrthCl' 01tiCL1SSlOn, DI[", }iH L1-fll Gee , ~~i~ } ~- ~~~ _. 'C L'.]i l~]'C :1 ---~+---~
and it has unanimously voted to confirm the Robertson Request to
Divide Land as a Class A Exemption application and to recommend to
the Board of County Commissioners that any approval of such application
s[ipulate that no subsequent application will be accepted i.~hic.h
proposes further division of the property.
~;;
~~