Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC HEALTHAND ENVIRONMENT, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale-Pnge 6, Permit NO. CO-0044377 <br />Tnhlo V7_R _ ~ nifn.ino Ronviromantc !nr rlutf ll HOG <br />,r.,.:; #t' ~. <br />. y ~. Ppramete a4 d. ~? .,,,,-..'`'z-~ s?~3*- sx~n-Tr n-. ~ "3 s' <br />... :1Vfeasurement Fte uerr<cy .l«~", ~ t + s :~-. n. "-~;• E <br />',s~ 's'"~,.ItLL$arti 'lerT e ;s_:,.~-;",- <br />ffluent Fdow, MGD Once er week Instantaneous or Continuous <br />uent Settleable Solids, ml/l Once er month Grab <br />went H, s. u. Once er week In-situ <br />fluent Oil and Grease, m /1 Once er week Visual <br />uentTDS, m /1 Once er uarter Grab <br />C. Reporting <br />1. Dischar e Monitarin~Report: The Bear Coal Company, Inc. shall submit Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRsJ on a month) <br />asis to t ie ivision. The~ivision now requires all permittees to submit DMRs monthly. These re orts should contain t e <br />required summarization of the test results for parameters shown in Tables VI-5 and VI-6 and Part LBPI of the permit. See the <br />permit, Part LE.1. for details on such submisston. <br />2. S ecial Re orts. Special reports are required in the event of a spill, bypass, or other noncompliance. Please refer to Part LE. <br />o t e permit or reporting requirements. <br />D. Additional Terms and Conditions <br />1. Si Hato and Certi tcation Re uirements: Signatory and certification requirements far reports and submittals are discussed in <br />art .. o t e permit. <br />Compliance Schedules: <br />All information and written reports required by the following compliance schedules should be directed to the Permits Unit for <br />final review untess otherwise stated. <br />a. Materials Containment Plana The permittee has previous)y submitted an engineered spill plan. An update to the plan is <br />require to e t e wit in 0 days of the permit effective date, detailing all changes that have occurred since the original <br />submittal. If no changes have occurred, a letter to this effect is required For specifc requirements, refer to Part LD.1. of <br />the permit. <br />c. Annual Storm;eater Re ort' The permittee :vill be required to submit an arnua! stormwater report, covering January I <br />t roug t ecem er a each year, on the overall compliance with the SWMP. The Annual Report will be due to the <br />Division on or before February 15 of the fallowing year (see Part I.D.2.g of the permit). <br />~.Co e;.-; ~ . >s-ent. ~ -s`d;. ~^sasr~ ~~w~ ,m s~:t ".. -~'.-; . u, ., ~= .ec-rrtzt.,. tatton'€.,- a ~ ue~Fate..~•rru - <br />tormwater anagement an nnua eports art . _g. __ ext refit ue <br />E. 41'aste Minimization/Pollution Prevention <br />Fl'aste minimization and pollution prevention are two terms that are becoming increasingly more common in industry today. Waste <br />minimization includes reducing the amount of waste at the source through changes in industrial processes, and reuse and recycling <br />o r wastes for the original or some other urpose (such as materials recovery or energy production). Pollution prevention goes <br />li tnd-in-hand with waste minimization. I~he waste is eliminated at the front of the line, it will not have to be treated at the end of <br />the line. The direct benefits to the industry are often s[gniftcant, both in terms of increased profit and in ublic relations. This <br />program can affect a[I areas of process and waste control with which an industry deals. Elimination or reduction of a wastewater <br />pollutant can also result in a reduction in an air pollutant or a reduction in the amount of hazardous materials that must 6e handled <br />or disposed. <br />Tiiis discharge permit does not spect~catly dictate waste minimization conditions at this time. The Division does strongly encourage <br />the permittee to continue working in developing and implementing a waste minimization plan. Several industries have already <br />developed plans and found that implementation resulted in substantial savings. Both the Colorado Department ofPublic Health and <br />Environment and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have information and resources available. For more in-depth <br />inFrmation, please contact these agencies. <br />VII. REFE1tENCES <br />Christopher L. Gates <br />March 9, 2004 <br />A. "Basic Standards and Methodologies for Surface Water, " Regulation No. 3/, Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, <br />effective October 30, 2001. <br />B. "Ciassificafions and Numeric Standards for Gunnison and Lower Dolores River Basins", Regulation No. 35, Colorado Water <br />Quality Control Commission, effective February 20, 2002. <br />C. "C'alorado Discharge Permit System Regulations ", Regulation No. 61, Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, effective June <br />30, 2003. <br />D. "Re ulations for Effluent Limitations,'" Regulation No. 62, Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, effective December 30, <br />1998. <br />E. "Colorado Total Maximum Daily Load and Wasieload Allocation Guidance", Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment, YVater Quality Control Dtviston, effective November 1991. <br />F. " 4ntidegradation Signi icance Determination for New or Increased Water Quality Impacts, Procedural Guidance, "Colorado <br />Department ofPublic ealth and Environment, Water Quality Contro[ Division, effective December 2001. <br /> <br />