Laserfiche WebLink
-I5- <br />In the case of drill seeding, the seeder is followed by a chain drag <br />which covers the seed. Broadcasted seed is covered with soil using a chain <br />harrow or similar implement. <br />Item: Fertilizing. <br />Response: On page 5 of the Amendment, fertilizer application procedures are <br />explained. All seeded slopes will be fertilized as suggested by the review <br />comments, i.e., fertilizer will be added separately from seed application to avoid <br />exposing seed to direct contact with fertilizer. This procedure provides for <br />seed coverage and slow release of the fertilizer with precipitation. <br />The Annual Reports document success with various fertilizer applications. <br />The only topsoiled area is on the 10800 level. All other work has been <br />performed on subsoil. Thus the results are directly applicable to the <br />reclamation plan. Additional fertilization needs may be assessed by the plant <br />inspection that will occur during reclamation activities. <br />Item: Mulch on 2:1 slopes. <br />Response: Hydromulch will be used on 2:1 slopes as was previously noted in <br />response to the question regarding seed application. <br />Item: Grass-shrub mixture and uptake of radionuclides. <br />Response: The site-specific mixture of grasses and shrubs is to be determined <br />upon completion of the reclamation plot work currently being conducted with <br />the SCS. Planting was completed at the shrub plot this summer. <br />As discussed in Supplemental Report S-4, plants are not known to be <br />concentrators of uranium or its daughters. R.G. Menzel ("Radioactivity Uptake <br />in Plants," p. 43-97, Proceedin s of the National Conference on Dis osal of <br />Residues on Land, September 13-1 19 c asst ies uranium and ea in a <br />"strongly excluded" (from concentration) group and radium as in the "not <br />concentrated" group. Thorium is also considered to be "strongly excluded." <br />Item: Pond Slopes. <br />Response: The South Pit lake is designed to provide water for wildlife and <br />to reduce the potential impact of peak flows in drainage channels located <br />immediately downstream of the South Pit. In the Technical Revision to the <br />Pitch Project permit submitted on June 9, 1982, and which was subsequently <br />approved, the same general configuration for a pond was shown. Portions of <br />the slopes of that pond, in areas where the pit walls were steeper, were on the <br />order of 1.6:1. The application for the permit submitted in 1977 showed a similar <br />lake in the North Pit. <br />The applications have consistantly recognized the need to provide access <br />to such a pond. The access is provided along the ramp that enters the pond <br />from the north, and in the spillway area on the southwest. The slopes beneath <br />the anticipated water level will be cut slopes, not fill slopes; and will <br />therefore be relatively stable. The steeper slopes are aligned with the steeper <br />portions of the South Pit. <br />