Laserfiche WebLink
_. - <br />Mr. Ryan -4- August 30, 1983 <br />2. In conjunction to Number 1 above, the application needs to have a <br />clear plan in which disturbances will be bonded. Incongruities exist in <br />the application regarding affected acreages (eg. the plant site acreage <br />is reported alternately as 1'2 and 8). <br />Phase-bonding of small mining areas usually does not allow an operator <br />the necessary flexibility in the event a large quantity of agyregate is <br />demanded. Une must also take into consideration that there will be a lag <br />period between the mining and reclamation phases. Although we will not <br />try and dictate how the mining plan should progress, for the above stated <br />reasons, we question the practicability of this proposal. <br />Exhibit M - Local Government Approval <br />As you may be aware, Rule 1.56(6) requires that the operation be in <br />conformance with local zoniny before the MLRB can take action regarding <br />this application. <br />Exhibit N - Uther Permits <br />Have you contacted the State Health Department to inquire whether a <br />fugitive dust permit (or other emissions permit) may be required? <br />Uther <br />Please send proof of publication and copies of certified notices to all <br />iinnediately adjacent landowners (includiny the power companies, Public <br />Service;Company, Coors). <br />In order to provide for adequate review tune prior to the Septemuer Board <br />meeting, responses should be returned by no later than September 23, <br />1983, otherwise a continuance should be requested. Please call if you <br />have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael Stanton <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />MS/th <br />Doc. No. 517b <br />