Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />~.1 <br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Page 10. Permit No. CO-0026981 <br />CHANGES SINCE PUBLIC NOTICE: (Continued) <br />The Regulations for the State Discharge Permit System, 6.1.0 (amended 4/14186, <br />effective 5/30/86) further define this requirement under 6.12.0 and states: <br />"Where economic, environmental, public health, and affected persons have been <br />considered in the classifications and standards setting process, permits written <br />to meet the standards may be presumed to have taken into consideration economic <br />factors unless: <br />(a) Anew permit is issued where the discharge was not in existence at the time <br />of the classification and standards rulemaking, or <br />(b) In the case of a continuing discharge, additional information or factors <br />have emerged that were not anticipated or considered at the time of the <br />classification and standards rulemaking. <br />The issues of economic, environmental, public health, or energy impacts of <br />meeting proposed water quality standard-based effluent limitations have been <br />raised by the permittee in the Camp Bird Venture comment letters. The division <br />requested any additional information relative to these issues by letter of April <br />20, 1987 and the permittee responded by letters of April 29, 1987 and June 2, <br />1987. <br />Based on a review of all available information, including material submitted by <br />Camp Bird Venture, the division concludes that the water quality standard based <br />effluent limitations of this permit are reasonably related to the economic <br />environmental, public health and energy impact to the public and affected <br />persons. <br />In addition, Federal Resources at the previous rulemaking hearing did not <br />participate as one of the private sector entites which were identified <br />concerning potential economic impacts as a result of the proposed standards in <br />the basin. At the time of the hearings for the water quality standards for the <br />Gunnison and Lower Dolores River Basin, the Water Quality Control Commission <br />concluded that the standards which were adopted were economically reasonable. <br />After the Commission reconsidered the economic factors at issue in this basin <br />for the 10/30/86 effective date for the Gunnison River Basin triennial review, <br />it was concluded the classifications and numeric standards were economically <br />reasonable both in terms of potential costs that may result, and in terms of the <br />beneficial uses to be considered. <br />In the August 12, 1987 comment letter for Camp Bird Venture, the permittee <br />indicated that during the 1983 standards adoption process that the WQCC did not <br />have any economic information before it from the area mining companies which <br />were generally inactive at that time and the companies were not in a position to <br />develop presentations or data for the Commission. Presently, Camp Bird Venture <br />is developing economic information to be presented before the Commission at the <br />time when the water quality standards for Segment 9 will be reevaluated. This <br />permit will be reopened for reevaluation of metals limits as soon as requested <br />by Camp Bird Venture after the effective date when the Commission has made any <br />changes in the Segment 9 standards. <br />