Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Water Qualiry Control Division <br />'~ Rationale -Page 3, Permit No. CO-0032751 <br />Only exceedance of the limitation will trigger the requirement for conducting the automatic compliance <br />schedule identified in Part I.B. of the permit. if the tonicity is due to differences in the growth of the <br />fathead minnows or the reproduction of the Ceriodaphnia, no immediate action on the pan of the <br />pamittee will bt required. However, t/ris incident, along with other WET data, will be et+aluated by the <br />Division and may form the basis for reopening the permit and including additional WE,!' Umits or other <br />requiremenu. <br />dJ General I formation: The perniittee should read the WET testing secnans of Pan I.A. and I.B. of the <br />permit carefully. The permit outlines the trst requirements and the required follow-up actions the <br />pmnittce must take to resolve a taziciry encidem. The permittee should read, along wGle the docwnents <br />listed in Pan LB of the permit, the Colorado Water Quality Control Division Biomonitorin¢ Guidance <br />Document. dated July 1, 1993. This document outlines the criteria used by the Division in such areas as <br />granting reUeffrom WET testing, modifying test methods and changing test species. The permitter should <br />be aware that some of the conditions outlined above may be subject to change if the fa:iliry uperiences a <br />change in discharge, as outlined in Pan II.A.1 of the permit. Such changes shall be repotted to the <br />Division immediately. <br />Antideeradatian: Since this permitting action will nor result in an increase in any effluem concentration k)rut err <br />effluent flow limit, the receiving inter is not a "reviewable inter", pursuam to section 3.1.8(31(aJ of The Basic <br />Standards and Methodoloeies for Surface. Water, based upon afending of no increased water quality impact. <br />Rich Harstmann <br />July 26, 1954 <br />