My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53498
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996049
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/11/1996
Doc Name
ADEQUACY RESPONSE FOR MARYLAND CREEK RANCH PN M-96-049
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Christina Kamnikar <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />October 11, ]996 <br />Page 4 <br />2) In order to maintain historic runoff rates in the plant area, two stormwater detention ponds were <br />designed. It was calculated that a total of 2.3 acre-feet of detention is required to account for stormwater <br />quality as well as peak flow detention volumes. A culvert will run under the entrance road connecting <br />the two detention ponds. <br />The 12 inch perforated standpipe outlet of the west pond has a connecting culvert which conveys flows <br />from both ponds into the ditch along State Highway 9. This flow is then conveyed under State Highway <br />9 through a culvert and eventually ends up in the Blue River. The detention ponds along with the berms <br />and direction of flow are shown on the Process Plant Area map. An example of a perforated standpipe <br />surrounded by a gravel pack is shown in the enclosed detention pond detail. The plant area detention <br />ponds will look similar to this. <br />3) <br />and <br />4) Projected water requirements and augmentation analysis is now in progress. L. G. Everist has shown <br />sufficient water rights to cover the consumptive uses in the Exhibit G section. The analysis will be <br />,submitted on October 18, 1996. <br />D) Exhibit H -Wildlife Information <br />On July 15, 1996 the Colorado Division of Wildlife reviewed our application through the Summit <br />County process. The Division of Wildlife prepared a Project Matrix II using their Summit County <br />information. In this process the DOW analyzes the property and notes animals which may frequent the <br />site. Of the animals noted, the Bald Eagle was the only species in the endangered or threatened status. <br />The Bald Eagle is an endangered species by federal designation in Colorado. <br />Through the years of operation inunediately across the highway, the applicant has occasionally observed <br />solitary eagles in the vicinity. They have never observed a nesting or roosting site on the Maryland <br />Creek Ranch site. The activity by eagles is on the east side of State Highway 9 near the existing gravel <br />lakes and the Blue River. <br />E) Exhibit S -Permanent Manmade Structures <br />Attached with this letter is a copy of an agreement with Public Service Company on [he power lines. <br />The agreement with the Colorado Depaztment of Transportation regazding the State Highway 9 road and <br />ditch is pending. We hope to submit it to you prior to October 21, 1996. The McKay Ditch ends on the <br />Maryland Creek Ranch property, therefore, the ditch is the sole responsibility of L.G. Everist, Inc. The <br />operator will maintain the ditch during and after the operation to support the rangeland activities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.