My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52059
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:11:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Analytical Comparison Between Regraded Spoils & Adjacent Overburden Drill Holes
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX I Section 4.0
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overburden core holes 284AlOCR and 285A9EQ (see map I-1) are used for <br />discussion to compare overburden and spoil analysis to ensure that mixing <br />of regraded surfaces during spoil regrading was properly accomplished to <br />ensure adequate subsoil composition for plant root growth. The para- <br />meters of discussion are pH, EC, SAR and texture (% clay) as they could <br />be identified as having the potential to be problematic. Core hole <br />284AlOCR identified samples of cuttings from 42 feet directly above the <br />lowest mineable coal seam as being a potential problem when used as sub- <br />soil (spoil) material (Table I-2). Table I-5 compares the high soil <br />analysis levels recorded in the above-stated 42 feet of overburden mate- <br />rial to the actual soil parameters of adjacent spoils following regrade. <br />It is evident that mixing of regraded spoils and short term natural wea- <br />thering has eliminated any potential spoil problems. <br />i <br />Higher-than-desired values were also reported in core hole 285A9EQ, <br />approximately 14 feet above the lowest mineable coal seam. These values <br />were also reduced when compared to the adjacent spoils in which this <br />material was deposited (Table I-5 ). <br />When comparing other core holes which could be identified as having <br />higher-than-desired soil parameter levels (Table 2 and Map I-1) to adja- <br />cent spoils, similar reductions in spoil parameter analysis were <br />reported. Table I-6 provides a mean and a range of values for select <br />spoil parameters in Ashmore, Derringer, and Enfield pits. Suitability <br />criteria for spoil parameters is provided in Table I-7. <br />Of primary concern to Trapper and CMLRD is the higher-than-desired clay <br />content of overburden and associated spoils. The following discussion <br />and letter should provide ample justification that high clay content <br />soils are not problematic when associated with other soil parameters that <br />reduce their potential hazardous effects. <br />In reviewing Montana, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming overburden, spoil <br />analysis guidelines, all of these states base soil texture limitations on <br />associated SAR values. On mine spoils with high SAR values, the corres- <br />ponding percentage of clay should make up a smaller percentage of the <br />soil texture (<20Y,). As SAR values decrease, a corresponding percentage <br />of clay composition may increase without concern of dispersion or poten- <br />tial sodium hazard. <br />In Montana, spoils with a SAR of > 11 must meet a suitability criteria of <br />< 35% clay. For SAR values > 14 the clay percent should be < 20%. <br />In New Mexico, SAR < 14 may have a clay component of ) 40%. <br />The Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (DOSM) in Utah has set its SAR <br />unsuitability criteria for soil and overburden at > 12 for fine textured <br />soil materials (clays and clay to am s). <br />_.-~a <br />cont. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.