Laserfiche WebLink
• in the flooded workings. The Probable Hydrologic Consequences of each <br />coal waste disposal operation will be discussed below. <br />Backfilling of the Purgatoire Channel <br />Column leach tests were performed as an aid to the prediction of <br />water quality effects resulting from backfilling the existing channel <br />with coal refuse. Samples of the refuse that would be used for <br />backfilling were collected from four locations on January 12 and 13, <br />1984. Each sample is comprised of material composited over a depth <br />interval of 2 to 10 feet taken from the walls of backhoe pits as listed <br />below. <br />Sample No. DescriUtion <br />#8 Hackhoe pit adjacent to test hole #8, sampled from 2 to <br /> 10 feet, January 12, 1984. <br />#9 Backhoe pit adjacent to test hole #9, sampled from 2 to <br /> 10 feet, January 13, 1984. <br />• #10 Backhoe <br />f <br />t pit adjacent to test hole #10 sampled from 2 to <br /> 10 <br />ee <br />, January 13, 1984. <br />#11 Backhoe pit adjacent to test hole #11, sampled from 2 to <br /> 10 feet, January 13, 1984. <br />An ESM column leach test was conducted on each of two splits of <br />the coal refuse. The ESM test consists of displacing an antecedent pore <br />solution that is in chemical equilibrium with the solid phase. The <br />samples as received in the laboratory were contained in plastic bags and <br />were at the naturally occurring field moisture content. No additional <br />was added. Therefore, the antecedent moisture referred to in subsequent <br />discussion is the natural field moisture at the conditions of chemical <br />equilibrium dictated by the field environment. <br />The four samples were spread on a plastic sheet and thoroughly <br />mixed. The resulting composite was passed through a 0.371 in sieve to <br />remove the large particles that could not be accommodated in the leach <br />columns. The large particles have a very small specific surface and are <br />L J <br />(Revised OS/11194) <br />2.05-63 <br />