Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 3 <br />Mr. ICreissler <br />March 11, 1980 <br />JE. How wide will the road at the northern edge of the affected land bo; <br />will it connect to the highway to the north of the site; and what <br />will be its surface eomposition7 Map F is somewkat confusing in <br />this regard. <br />Exhibit G: <br />1. The permit application has been se~~ ~o the Colorado Division• of <br />~~ Water Resources for their review. Their cou¢nents will be passed <br />~ on when we receive them. <br />l 2. Ilow will all runoff waters be diverted into the excavated mineP <br />3. The Division oP Water Resources may request an augment lion plant <br />for the consumptive use of water due to evaporative loss from the <br />planned 39 acre lake. <br />;;xhibit 11: <br />The permit application has been sent to the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife for their review. Their comments (if any) will ba passe;] or. _ <br />wi3en we receive then. <br />Exhibit J: <br />Po the revegetation p{dns includes planting any of the tree species (e.g. <br />cottonwood, willow, etc.) listed Sn this section (e.g. along the northern <br />,and western perimeters of tno site) <br />Exhibit L: <br />J1, i:hy do 12.27 acres need grading but not topsol2in? before 1~lanting7 <br />i If areas such as roads are to be disturbed and Cher. planted, topsoil <br />should be stripped, planted and replaced. This may increase reclamation <br />1 costs for some percentage of those 12.27 acres. <br />:. If the 100' "undisturbed greer~.it" is Indeed undisturbed, it should <br />' have no reclamation costs associated with it. <br />3. Reclamatior. bond calculations can be done in more detail and a hor.3 <br />amount finalized when the exact acreage, topsoil volumes, etc., have <br />been M3s~,clearly identified. <br />(cunt}d) <br />