Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMEM OF PUBLIC HE <br />Rationale -Page 12, Permit No. CO-0000221 <br />3) <br />ojpit prrmpage, spoils sprin, <br />effluent toxicity and tosiciry <br />this basis, the Division belie <br />006, 010 and 011 to imerfet <br />Because ojthis, the acute tc <br />immedituely. The permirtee <br />reported as an LC,~. IJ the <br />compliance schedule as ides <br />4) <br />within segmem 13b. This <br />numeric standards. Thus, <br />004 and 008. Funkier, bet <br />their correlatiors to stream <br />seasonal IWC's jot these n <br />represent the mean of the t <br />conjunction with the 30E3 <br />monthly /WC per calendar <br />corresponding /WC jot ou( <br />highlighted in Bold and D~ <br />AND ENVlRONMElrl; Water Quality Control Division <br />alts 002. 003. 005. 006. 010 and OI1: The Division has found that discharges <br />water and similar sources from coal mines at similar sites have exhibiru <br />inures have previously occurred for some ojthe discharges at this jadlit <br />es there is reasonable potemial for the discharges from outfalls 002, 00~, 005, <br />with atrainmeru of applicable water quality classifications or standards. <br />iciry limit has been incorporated imo the permit and becomes eJj'ective <br />s required to conduct routine monitoring, the results ojwhich are to be <br />Cw <_ 100% effluent, the perminee is required to conduct the automatic <br />(ted in Pan /.A.4.c. of the permit. <br />utfalls 004 and 008: Outfalls 004 and 008 discharge ro Fish Creek, which is <br />meet is classified atptatic life, class 1, with all of the appropriate aquatic life <br />default to acute test!ng applied to the other outfalls does not apply to outfalls <br />se of the variable na,•ure aJ coal mine drainage and spoil spring flows auf <br />ws, it is appropriate to look beyond annual flows to determine more rea:istic <br />outfalls. The Division used discharge flaw values for each ourfa[l that <br />vthly average flows for each momh aver the period from 1986 through 1 X96 in <br />ueloped by the Division for Fish Creek. From these results, the highest <br />aver was selected as the quarnrly 1 WC. The monthly flows and <br />Ls 004 and 008 are shown in the following table. The selected IWCs are <br />Table VI-8 -Mean Monthly Discharg~ Flows jot Period 7986 - 1996 (cjs) and Corresponding IWCs <br />Out- <br />jau Jan Feb Mar A <br />I pr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct- Nov - . ltec <br /> <br />004 <br />.0546 <br />.0889 <br />.2660 <br />.5 <br />8 <br />.2909 <br />.1787 <br />.0807 <br />.0629 <br />.0609 <br />.0650 <br />.0673 _ <br />.G <br /> <br />Flow ~ <br />004 3.3 5.3 10.8 l .3 6.1 9.0 16.8 77.3 16.9 7.5 7.8 :'.3 <br />IWC ° <br />008 .0314 .0395 .2813 .3 73 .2068 .0933 .0706 .0493 .0427 .0580 .0424 .L422 <br />Flow <br />008 1.9 2.4 ]1.3 9 3 4.4 7.2 75.0 14.1 12.5 6.8 5.0 :'.7 <br /> <br />On the same basis as stated <br />Jor the discharges from outfi <br />classifications or standards. <br />becomes effective immeditue <br />resting are ro be reported oc <br />statistical derivation on the <br />control and the effluent cont <br />(lefhaliry, growth and reprot <br />significant difference in the <br />concentration less than ar et <br />to follow the automatic com! <br />is due to organism lethality. <br />requiremem for conducting i <br />the toxicity is due to differet <br />Ceriodaphnia, no immediate <br />along with other WET data, <br />permit and including tulditic <br />for acute limitations above, the Division believes there is reasonable potential <br />1!s 004 and 008 to interfere with attainment of applicable water qualify <br />Because ojthis condition, the chronic limit is continued in the permit and <br />~•. The permiffee is required to conduct ravine monitoring. The results oJthe <br />Division approved forms. The permittee will be required to conduct a <br />Tara, looking jot am statistically significant difference in toxicity between the <br />entrations. This set of calculatioru will look at the full range of toxicity <br />'action). Ifa level of chronic toxicity occurs, such that there is a statisti~:alh~ <br />ethaliry (af the 95~o confidence level) between the control and any efflue,tt <br />Dual to the Insrream A'aste Concentration (IlVC), the permittee will be required <br />~liance schedule identified in Part l.A.S.c. ojthe permit, if the observed toxicity <br />Only exceedance of the limitation specified in Pan I.A.l.j. will trigger the <br />he automatic compliance schedule idemified in Pan I.A.S. c. of the permi!. IJ <br />ces in the growth of the fathead minnows or the reproduction of the <br />action on the pan of the permitree will be required. However, this incident <br />will be evaluated by the Division and may form the basis for reopening tl it~ <br />wl WET limits or oth,sr requiremems. <br />