Laserfiche WebLink
- Whether the Applicant has adequately described the game and non-game <br />resources, including threatened and endangered species, on and in the vicinity of <br />the application area, and provided a description of the impacts to such resources <br />during mining and reclamation, and appropriate measures, as required by Rule <br />6.4.8. <br />- Whether the Applicant has provided adequate dust control and mitigation <br />measures. <br />- Whether the Applicant has submitted an adequate reclamation plan to achieve <br />the post-mining land use of "wildlife habitat" as required by Rule 3.1.10 and <br />6.4.5, and specifically, with respect to re-vegetation and noxious weed control. <br />- Whether the Applicant has provided an adequate demonstration of vegetation <br />resources, including wetlands, as required by Rule 6.4.10. <br />-any matter presented by the Applicant or any other party. <br />II. EXHIBITS NEW TO DMG PUBLIC FILE. <br />Objection letter from Estella B. Leopold to Colorado Division of Wildlife dated <br />December ] 8, 2004. <br />2. Vicinity maps. <br />3. Any exhibit presented or identified by the Applicant or any other party, whether <br />used or unused. <br />III. EXHIBITS ALREADY PART OF DMG PUBLIC FILE. <br />1. Objection letter from Estella B. Leopold to Division of Minerals and Geology <br />dated December 17, 2004. <br />2. Any exhibit presented or identified by the Applicant or any other party, whether <br />used or unused. <br />3. Any other document added to the DMG public file concerning this app]ication. <br />