My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO21907
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO21907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:06 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
12/1/1983
Doc Name
Expected regional hydrologic impact of mining
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~z/~ /~3 <br />WFC SUBMITTAL 3 <br />EXPECTED REGIONAL HYDROLOGIC IMPACTS OF MINING <br />(APACHE, CIRUELA AND SANTISTEVAN CANYONS) <br />Undermining Apache, Santistevan and Ciruela Canyons should not result in mateial <br />damage to surface and/or alluvial aquifer systems present. This conclusion is supported by <br />calculations attached) which demonstrate that even at conservatively assumed high <br />surface flow conditons, the low transmissivities of the 400 to 800 feet of overburden will <br />allow insignificant amounts of surface water to reach the mine workings. <br />It is WFC's contention that no significant alluvial aquifers are present in these <br />canyons. Rather, isolated areas of subsurface water occur in colluvial fill material. This <br />is evidenced by the limited areal extent of hydrophytic vegetation and from drilling <br />experience by WFC in similar side canyons near Segundo, Colorado. <br />Additionally, based on subsidence data collected over longwall and room and pillar <br />mining areas at the Allen Mine, subsidence should not materially increase this <br />transmissivity, as the overburden subsides as a unit with very little horizontal strain or <br />surface expression. Partial subsidence data results indicate a maximum vertical <br />displacement of about 3 feet over a 6 foot high longwall panel and maximum horizontal <br />displacement of less than 1 foot ~WOOdWdrd-Clyde report 9-9-83). <br />Approximately 3 miles of the western part of Apache Canyon have been undermined <br />with total extraction over the past 30 years. There is no surface indication of subsidence <br />evident: power poles have remained vertical, no cracks are present in the road or side <br />hills, trees remain vertical, and side hills have apparently remained stable. <br />Both the Allen and Maxwell Mines underly the same strata. These strata do not <br />contain significant aquifers due to their discontinuous and lenticular nature. The only <br />water-bearing strata of any consequence are some of the coal seams themselves, such as <br />the Maxwell seam. On the basis that no overlying aquifers exist, it appears evident that <br />undermining will not materially affect groundwater regimes. <br />The attached tables and exhibits summarize results of inflow studies performed <br />recently in the Allen and Maxwell Mines. Water inflows in the Allen Mine have averaged <br />approximately 123 gpm for the third quarter 1983. Of that amount, approximately 88 gpm <br />is being generated from mined out gob areas totalling approximately 2800 acres. The <br />northerly half of-that acreage is under the Purgatoire River and the southerly half is <br />under Apache Canyon. It is impossible to determine how much of this 88 gpm.is from <br />surface sources and how much is from groundwater sources; however, it appears evident <br />that this small drainage rate from a large undermined area should not reflect material <br />impact on water available to overlying isolated alluvial aquifers or the overall hydrologic <br />regime of the area. <br />Inflows in the Maxwell Mine have averaged about 30 gpm for the third quarter 1983. <br />Approximately 16 gpm is from the air shafts and a drill hole and the remainder is from <br />seepage originating in the coal seam aquifer. There is no evidence that any of this inflow <br />is from surface sources. The 16 gpm from the shafts and drill hole is likely from overlying <br />coal seams and/or other localized water-bearing strata. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.