Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Ann Hodgson • <br />November 13, 1980 <br />Page Two <br />the storm retention pond. I still need this. <br />5. As is mentioned by the Division of Water Resources, the data given <br />is not sufficient to justify the contention that final reclamation <br />will not materially affect downstream water rig;~ts. I will mention <br />again that the pond may need on outlet of some type. <br />Exhibit H <br />3. I am still not certain of the potential wildlife values of the <br />storm retention pond. <br />Exhibits I E J <br />3. What is the planned depth of topsoil in reclamation, using all <br />topsoil? Is this indeed to be only 3 to 6 inches over bedrock? <br />Exhibit L <br />I will still need the recalculated reclamation costs before the meeting <br />next Thursday. When I have them, we can discuss bonding further. <br />1 have examined both the conversion application document (map and list, <br />pages A-6 and A-7) and your list of notifications, and I notice that <br />John D. Post has not been notified as an adjacent landowner. Why has <br />he not been notified? <br />t have tried to get this follow-up <br />still hope, that we can settle all <br />meeting (probably in the morning). <br />letter to you as soon as possible. <br />adequacy questions by next Thursday's <br />Sincerely, <br />Mark S. Loye <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />MSL/jm <br />