Laserfiche WebLink
Michael A. Sayler, P.E. <br />August 28, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br />12. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or =_videntiary torte, shall not <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a :;efense in the pending <br />water court case or any other legal action that may be initiated ccr~ceming the substitute <br />water supply plan. This decision shall not bind the state enginee- to act in a similar manner <br />in any other applications involving other plans or in amp proposed renewal of this plan, and <br />shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusicrs of law contained herein, <br />or with the engineering methodologies used by the Lafarge. Any ~opeal of a decision <br />made by the state engineer concerning a substitute water suppl} clan pursuant to 37-92- <br />308 (4) shall be to the Division 1 water judge within thi;~~ days o`::ie date of his approval. <br />Should you have any further comments or questions; please ccntact Dave Nettles, <br />Assistant Division Engineer, in Greeley at 970-3~2-8712 or Joanna VVif;ams of this office. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kenneth W. Knox <br />Chief Depuf)~ State Engineer <br />AEtachments: Table 7 and Table ~ <br />Cc: Dave Nettles, Assistant Division Engineer <br />Scott Edgar, Water Commissioner <br />Bob Carlson, Water Commissioner <br />Frederick Fendel, III <br />Wendy Rudnik <br />Stephen Cann <br />Veronica Sperling <br />Mary Nlead Hammond <br />Lori Coulter <br />K1NKIJNNV <br />