My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50066
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50066
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:18:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004078
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/14/2005
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #3
From
DMG
To
SW TKO Joint Venture LLC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03'128!2095 11:47 970834029404 JOE INTERMILL PAGE 04 <br />PAGE3 <br />EXHiBTT E-RECLAMA77ON PLAN: <br />Paragraph (a) of the Reclamation plan shows that 4 water storage ponds are proposed, <br />ranging in size from 23 acres to 94 acres. They total approximately 277 acres of surface <br />area. Reclamation plan, map 6, shows two ponds, one at 86.4 acres and one at 175 acres. <br />'there is also an area labeled 19.3 acre wethuuUpond area . Which is correct, the oaRative <br />or the snap? Our concern is with the amount of wave action erosion that can be created by <br />wind blowing over1/2f mile of open water. <br />-- --- ----- <br />--- - <br />- - - ~Ve are also conoemad~by ttie piemtse of muvng the cCaystone and utilizuag it as the <br />material for the clay lining in the ponds, Ms. ORiz and Mr. Rainer have arranged for us to ' <br />view a similar operation next week at a nearby location. <br />It is understood that mining and reclamation schedules are difficult to establish considering <br />that the operation is driven by market demand, weather, and m~merous other factors that <br />the operator is unable to control. However, after reviewing pertinent supplemental data <br />submitted with the easement i~'ormation, the Reclamation Plan, the lvfuiin~Plan, and the <br />various maps, it appears that the 1:2 slopes between the buffer area and the excavated area <br />could stand untreated for somewhere between 2 and 9-1(2 years before the clay lisring is <br />wmpleted. The otdy reason this is of concern to CDOT is that steep slopes ,left for an <br />extended period of time tend to erode and cave back into the adjacem material. This <br />situation could potentially reduce the width of the natural buffer area between the pond <br />and the CDOT ROW. Also, are there drainage trenches along the tce of the slopes <br />paralleling HWY 85? If so, since these western pods are scheduled to be mined earlier, <br />will the slopes be left unlined until completion of excavation in the area so as not to <br />disrupt the drainage operation? <br />TS there a provision for some type of keying operation to help bond the clay liner to the <br />claystone bedrock, and prevent the intrusion of water between the liner aad the bedrock? <br />Tt is assumed that the liner material will be placed in horizontal lifts with some type of <br />keying or benching into the adjacent alluvial sand and gravel. <br />1. Is there a maximum loose or wmpacted lift thickness? <br />2. What type of compaction equipment will be used? <br />3. Will moisture/densitytests be required on the compacted liner, and if so at <br />what frequency? <br />The slope stability calculations were submitted to the CDOT Geotechnical Unit for their <br />review and comments, We anticipate their report early this week. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.