My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE50044
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE50044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:54:47 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 2:18:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990041
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/29/1990
From
MINSEARCH INC
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />to a finer grind than the ore that was processed and discharged <br />by former operators of the mill. By grinding to a fiber mesh, <br />metal recoveries will greatly increase which will limit the <br />amount of heavy metals discharged by the mill. Also, by <br />installing a Final Clean-up flotation cell to remove all pyrite <br />from the mill tailings, the tailings discharged from the Golden <br />Gilpin mill will contain far fewer contaminents than tailings <br />that have been discharge in the past. As a result, the quality <br />of they ground water in the Golden Gilpin tailings should actually <br />improve over a period of time. <br />A characteristic of flotation recovery is that it operates at a <br />pH of approximately 8.2. Therefore, the elevated pH of the mill <br />process solution will have a neutralizing effect on the low pH <br />ground water that underlies the existing Golden Gilpin mill. <br />The Cramp Dresser and McKee soil scientist that logged the ground <br />water test hole recorded a number of soil parameters of the drill <br />hole cuttings. These results are also shown on an enclosed <br />table. <br />DEFICIENCY RESPONSE 5 <br />A. The design for transferring solution from one pond to another <br />is shown on the enclosed figure. By using this solution transfer <br />design, no short circuiting of the process solution in the mill <br />treatment pond will occur. <br />B. In the event that the limestone becomes coated with iron <br />precipitates and the pH adjustment capabilities of the limestone <br />becomes reduced, new limestone will be added to maintain a <br />solution discharge pH of approximately 7.0. <br />C. CCCM currently intends to fire the peat to obtain an ash <br />product. The resulting ash will be backfilled into the Bates- <br />Hunter mine. <br />D. As discussed, the pH of the discharged mill solution will be <br />approximately 8.2. Depending on when the pH of North Clear Creek <br />as it flows by the Golden Gilpin mill is taken, i.e. during <br />periods of high or low flow, the pH of North Clear Creek can vary <br />from a low of 5.5 to a high of approximately 6.5 (CCCM tests). <br />CDM test water near the Golden Gilpin Mill and obtained a pH <br />reading of 6.2 (see enclosed table). The discharge of treated <br />process solution with a slightly elevated pH will only serve to <br />improve the water quality of North Clear Creek by adjusting the <br />pH of t~orth Clear Creek to a more neutral pH. <br />DEFICIENCY RESPONSE 6 <br />CCCM will commit to provide MLRD with a copy of the Water Quality <br />Control. Division discharge permit when the permit is issued to <br />CCCM. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.