Laserfiche WebLink
The following items evaluated during the site visit were <br />compared to the design presentd~in the March 19, 1979 <br />submittal. <br />Pond A <br />1) Constructed elevations: the elevations listed below <br />were checked with a precision level and stadia rod: <br />-Dewatering pipe inlet <br />-Dewatering pipe outlet <br />-Top of Dam <br />-Bottom of Spillway <br />-Toe of Dam <br />-Bottom of Pond <br />-Inlet pipe into pond <br />All elevations were found to be within 0.3 feet of the <br />design. <br />2) Width of Spillway Design: The pond was meant to <br /> contain the 25 year - 24 hour storm so that no <br /> emergency spillway is required. Measured: a rip-rap <br /> lined area along a low spot of the dam measuring 20 <br /> feet across at an average depth of 6 inches. <br />3) Height of Embankment Design: 10 feet. Measured: 10 <br /> feet. <br />4) Slope of Dam Design: 2.SH:1.OV. Measured: 3.OH:1.OV <br />5) Width of top of Dam Design: Not specified. <br /> Measured: 15 feet. <br />6) Rip-Rap along Curtis Creek Embankment Design: <br />Durable Class I Rip-Rap (508 + 6" size) on entire <br />embankment along Curtis Creek. Measured: as specified. <br />7) Topsoil and Vegetation Removal cound not be verified, <br />however it appeared that the proper measures were <br />taken. Soil was replaced on all non-rip-rap areas. <br />8) Embankment Compaction Design: 958 of density <br />determined from proctor method AASHTO designation T-99. <br />Mesured: although unable to verify density, it was <br />apparent that adequate compaction had been achieved <br />from inspecting overall construction of the embankment, <br />the lack of seepage and cracking, bulging or sliding. <br />