Laserfiche WebLink
conductivity of the alluvial portions of the aquifer was set at 400 feet per day and adjusted in areas of <br />higher bedrock as discussed in section 2.3. <br />Tabte 2: Comparison of Simulated vs. Measured Water Levels <br /> <br />Well 3/10/2004 <br />Measured <br />Elev D Modeled <br /> <br />Elev Dry Mod-Meas <br /> <br />Difference X3/2004 <br />Measured <br />Elev Wet Modeled <br /> <br />Elev Wet Mod-Meas <br /> <br />Difference <br />TSMW-1 4953.5 4953.8 0.3 4954.7 4959.6 4.9 <br />TSMW-2 4954.4 4955.1 0.7 4955.6 4960.5 4.9 <br />TSMW-3 4953.6 4953.7 0.1 4954.1 4957.0 2.9 <br />TSMW-4 4951.8 4951.8 0.0 4952.5 4955.8 3.3 <br />TSMW-5 4952.5 4953.3 0.9 4953.9 4960.0 6.1 <br />TSMW-6 4951.3 4951.1 -0.2 4952.0 4955.5 3.5 <br />TSMW-7 4951.4 4950.6 -0.8 4951.5 4953.7 2.2 <br />TSMW-8 4951.3 4950.7 -0.6 4951.1 4953.0 1.9 <br />TSMW-9 4948.6 4946.6 -1.9 4949.8 4949.0 -0.8 <br />TSMW-10 4948.5 4946.9 -1.6 4949.4 4948.8 -0.6 <br />TSMW-I1 4946.6 4944.2 -2.4 4947.6 4945.8 -1.8 <br />TSMW-12 4948.0 4945.9 -2.1 4949.9 4950.1 0.2 <br />TSMW-13 4944.3 4937.6 -6.7 4948.1 4941.0 -7.1 <br />TSMW-14 4945.5 4942.9 -2.6 4948.6 4952.5 3.9 <br />TSMW-IS 4947.2 4945.6 -1.6 4950.1 4957.4 7.3 <br />TSMW-16 4954.5 4949.4 -5.1 4955.3 4957.2 1.9 <br />TSMW-17 4951.5 4954.3 2.8 4953.9 4962.9 9.0 <br />BBA-1 4946.93 4946 -0.9 4949.88 4947.8 -2.1 <br />BBA-2 4946.40 4945.1 -1.3 4949.02 4946.8 -2.2 <br />BBA-3 4947.97 4947.5 -0.5 4950.39 4949.5 -0.9 <br />Average: -1.2 Average: 1.8 <br />3.3 Mining and Post-MininE Simulation Results <br />The model was used to simulate both the water table effects during mining and the long-term changes in <br />water table conditions as a result of the mining activities and associated water storage facilities. The <br />potential effects on neighboring wells and surrounding areas were evaluated by comparing simulated <br />pre-mine wet (high) and dry (]ow) season levels with simulated during- and post-mine seasonal high and <br />low water levels. <br />The model area is very dynamic, with many hydrologically impacting activities planned for the near <br />future. Hence, numerous scenarios were run to show the individual effects of the various activities. At <br />the time of this report, our understanding ofplanned activities in the area is as follows: <br />- The Seltzer well will be moved from the west cell to a location near the South Platte River <br />- The southern portion of the Rogers Pit will be dewatered again and mined out <br />- The Challenger Pit will be dewatered and mined <br />- The Baseline Mine will be dewatered and mined <br />- The Tucson South- southwest cell will be dredge mined <br />- The Tucson South- east cell will be surrounded by a slurry wall <br />- 7 - August 2004 <br />I:U919 019\TS GW Mod<I\TS R<potl\Tuaon SauVt_Rpt_Draft.doc <br />