Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />1 <br />Aboriginal archaeological remains affiliated with the Paleo-Indian and <br />Archaic stages, as well as Late Prehistoric remains may be expected. <br />Several sources were consulted concerning historic resources. These include <br />a statewide historical archaeology context (Buckles and Buckles 1984), a Colorado <br />_ plateau country historic context (Husband 1984), and a Colorado engineering con- <br />text (King 1984). These RP-3 documents published by the Colorado Historical <br />Society are aimed at providing a research framework in which historic cultural <br />resources can be evaluated. A perusal of these sources indicated the possible <br />presence of the following general resource types: <br />^ Sites related to the oil and gas industry <br />^ Sites related to the mining industry <br />;~ ^ Sites related to ranching <br />^ Sites related to transportation <br />^ Habitation sites <br />The discovery of other, more rare, resource types, such as sites related to <br />early exploration and the fur trapping era was also deemed possible. <br />In addition to the consultation of the documents mentioned above, site file <br />searches were conducted at the BLM White River Resource Area Office in Meeker, <br />Colorado on August 26, 1991, and by the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preser- <br />vation in Denver on August 26, 1991. The results of the literature searches are de- <br />scribed below. <br />A number of small projects, consisting of cultural resource surveys for explo- <br />ration holes and associated access roads, have been conducted within or near the <br />project area (e.g., Reed 1985, 1987, 1988, 1990; Reed and Nickens 1986). However, <br />no cultural resources were previously recorded within the project area. The area <br />immediately surrounding the project area was surveyed for cultural resources in <br />1979 (Chandler and Nickens 1979a, 1979b). While cultural resources in the vicinity <br />of the project area were documented, site density was generally found to be quite <br />low. Based on the results of the literature search, it was expected that perhaps one <br />prehistoric site and a small number of isolated finds might be encountered. <br />' S.0 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />The primary objective of the archaeological survey was to locate significant <br />cultural resources to aid in the preservation of those cultural resources or to facili- <br />~, fate the forttu]ation of appropriate mitigative strategies. This was accomplished <br />first by conducting site file searches at the Colorado Historical Society, and at the <br />Bureau of Land Management's White River Resource Area office; and, second, by <br />conducting intensive pedestrian surveys of the project areas. For the purpose of this <br />study, cultural resource sites were defined as areas containing evidence of patterned <br />l~ human activity, in excess of 50 years antiquity. Locations of artifacts evincmg great- <br />`' er than 50 years of age not meeting the cntena for site definition were classified as <br />isolated finds. Recommendations regarding the significance of the cultural re- <br />sources located by this pro]'ect are assessed using the criteria for determining eligibil- <br />(' ity for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The historic preserva- <br />',., tion laws mandating this cultural resource study specifically identify eligibility to the <br />National Register of Historic Places as the key factor in determining preservation <br />needs. The criteria for assessing site significance, as published in the p.S. Govern- <br />ment Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR 60) read as follows: <br /> <br />